X2GO vs NoMachine - Which one to choose?

Table of Contents

  • 1. key similarities between X2Go and NoMachine
  • 2. key differences between X2Go and NoMachine
  • 2.1. Platform Support & Architecture
  • 2.2. Security
  • 2.3. Installation & Ease of Use
  • 2.4. Performance & Multimedia
  • 2.5. Multi-User & Collaboration (Session Management)
  • 2.6. Scalability & Enterprise Features
  • Desktop Environment Compatibility, Device & Peripheral Support, Input & Multi-Monitor Support, Audio & Clipboard, File Transfer, Session Recording, Session Stability & Recovery, Monitoring & Admin Tools, Web Access & Clientless Connectivity, Customization & Extensibility
  • 2.17. Ideal Use Case Summary

  nomachine vs x2go

What is NoMachine?

NoMachine is a high-performance remote desktop software that allows users to securely access and control computers from anywhere over the internet or LAN. Designed for both personal and enterprise use, it supports Windows, Linux, macOS, Android, and iOS, and delivers a rich desktop experience with features like HD multimedia streaming, multi-monitor support, USB redirection, file transfer, and session recording. With its proprietary NX protocol, NoMachine ensures low-latency connections, making it ideal for both professional workflows and remote collaboration.

Key Features of NoMachine 

Cross-Platform Access

Supports Windows, Linux, macOS, Android, and iOS — allowing seamless desktop access across devices, including mobile and tablets.

HD Multimedia Streaming

Delivers smooth playback of video and audio with low latency, including OpenGL and DirectX acceleration — ideal for graphic-intensive applications.

Multi-Monitor Support

Lets users view and interact with multiple remote monitors, switch between them, or mirror displays with full fidelity.

Session Persistence & Reconnection

Automatically restores lost connections and allows users to resume previous sessions without data loss or restart.

Remote Access to Physical or Virtual Desktop

Connects to both ongoing physical desktop sessions or launches virtual desktops depending on user needs — great for live support or VDI.

File Transfer

Built-in drag-and-drop interface for moving files between local and remote systems securely and effortlessly.

Peripheral Redirection

Supports USB device redirection (printers, scanners, external drives) — enabling full use of remote peripherals as if they were local.

Advanced Input Handling

Supports multimedia keyboards, game controllers, and drawing tablets with pressure sensitivity — useful for creative and gaming workflows.

Clipboard Sync

Synchronizes clipboard content across local and remote systems — supports text, images, and formatted content.

Session Recording

Allows users to record sessions for training, auditing, or documentation — all stored locally for review.

Web-Based Access (Enterprise)

Web Companion lets users access desktops directly from a browser — no software install needed on the client side.

Security & Encryption

TLS encryption out-of-the-box; optional SSH and Kerberos support (Enterprise). Sessions are protected end-to-end.

Easy Setup & Configuration

One-click installers with auto-configuration make deployment fast, even for non-technical users.

 

What is X2GO?

X2Go is an open-source remote desktop solution designed primarily for Linux systems, allowing users to access graphical desktop environments over a secure SSH connection. It supports virtual X11 sessions, meaning each user gets an isolated desktop, and is optimized for low-bandwidth conditions. X2Go clients are available for Linux, Windows, and macOS, making it a reliable choice for developers, sysadmins, and academic environments that require secure, lightweight, and efficient remote access without the need for extensive graphical acceleration.

Key Features of X2GO

Open-Source & Free
Licensed under GPL, X2Go is fully open-source and cost-free for personal, educational, and commercial use.

Secure SSH-Based Access
All connections are tunneled through SSH, ensuring encrypted and authenticated remote sessions by default.

Isolated Virtual Desktop Sessions
Each user gets a dedicated, virtual X11 session — ideal for multi-user environments and remote labs.

Low Bandwidth Optimization
Designed to perform well over slow or unstable connections, thanks to effective compression and session suspension.

Client Support for Multiple Platforms
Clients available for Linux, Windows, and macOS, allowing cross-platform remote access to Linux servers.

Session Persistence
Supports disconnecting and reconnecting to running sessions without data loss — useful for long-term or interrupted work.

File Transfer via SSHFS
Securely mounts remote directories over SSH, enabling file access between local and remote systems.

Printer Forwarding
Allows remote printing by forwarding print jobs to the client-side printer through the X2Go client.

Audio Support via PulseAudio
Provides basic sound forwarding from the remote system to the client, mainly on Linux and Windows.

Lightweight Desktop Environment Compatibility
Best performance with XFCE, MATE, and LXDE — suitable for resource-constrained or headless servers.

NoMachine is a high-performance, cross-platform remote desktop solution offering rich multimedia streaming, multi-monitor support, device redirection, and browser-based access — ideal for enterprise and collaborative use. In contrast, X2Go is a lightweight, open-source remote desktop system focused on secure SSH-based access to Linux desktops, providing isolated virtual sessions optimized for low-bandwidth environments — making it well-suited for technical users and academic setups.

#1 key similarities between X2Go and NoMachine

Remote Desktop Access

Both allow full remote control of a graphical desktop environment, enabling users to work on remote systems as if they were local.

Multi-User Support

Each supports multiple users connecting simultaneously, with individual session handling — suitable for shared servers or team environments.

Session Persistence

Sessions can be suspended and resumed, allowing users to disconnect and reconnect without losing progress.

File Transfer

Both support secure file transfer between client and server:

  1. X2Go: via SSHFS
  2. NoMachine: via drag-and-drop GUI

Clipboard Sharing

Each allows clipboard synchronization (at minimum, text-based) between local and remote desktops.

Audio Forwarding

Remote audio playback is supported:

  1. X2Go: via PulseAudio
  2. NoMachine: natively with higher quality

Cross-Platform Client Support

Both provide clients for Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing remote access from various desktop platforms.

Secure Remote Access

Security is a focus for both:

  1. X2Go: via mandatory SSH tunneling
  2. NoMachine: via TLS, with optional SSH (Enterprise)

Printer Forwarding

Client-side printers can be accessed from the remote system, useful for office or academic setups.

OpenGL Support (Basic)

Each supports remote OpenGL applications to some extent:

  1. X2Go: limited or requires workarounds
  2. NoMachine: native and optimized

 

#2 key differences between X2Go and NoMachine

 

2.1 Platform Support & Architecture

X2Go:
✔ Functions as a Linux-only server, with client support for Windows, macOS, and Linux.
✔ Lacks mobile or web-based access, limiting flexibility outside desktop environments.
✔ Relies on an open-source NX protocol over SSH, optimized for secure and efficient remote sessions.

NoMachine:
✔ Offers full cross-platform compatibility, including iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, and Linux (client/server).
✔ Includes browser-based access via Web Companion — no client installation needed.
✔ Built on a proprietary NX-based protocol, designed for high-speed, multimedia-rich experiences.

X2Go is best suited for SSH-secured Linux desktop environments, while NoMachine delivers platform-agnostic access with rich media and mobile flexibility.

 

2.2 Security

X2Go:
✔ All sessions are tunneled through SSH by default, ensuring encrypted communication without extra configuration.
✔ Supports PAM, SSH key-based auth, and LDAP integration for centralized user control.
✔ Does not require separate certificates or TLS setup, simplifying secure deployment in Linux environments.

NoMachine:
✔ Uses TLS encryption out-of-the-box, providing secure sessions across all platforms; SSH is optional for advanced setups.
✔ Supports multiple authentication methods: OS credentials, SSH keys, and Kerberos (available in Enterprise edition).
✔ Includes session lock, auto-disconnect, and screen blanking for enhanced privacy during remote access.

X2Go offers a simple and robust SSH-secured model ideal for Linux infrastructure, while NoMachine provides broader security flexibility and enterprise-grade access control.

 

2.3 Installation & Ease of Use

X2Go:
✔ Requires manual installation of the x2goserver package, along with SSH configuration and compatibility tuning for desktop environments.
✔ Lacks automated wizards or GUIs for setup, making it more suitable for experienced sysadmins and Linux-savvy users.

NoMachine:
✔ Provides a one-click GUI installer for all major platforms, streamlining the setup process.
✔ Automatically configures network services, NAT traversal, and user access, requiring minimal technical effort.

X2Go demands hands-on setup expertise, while NoMachine prioritizes ease of deployment with a user-friendly installation and auto-configuration approach.

 

2.4 Performance & Multimedia

X2Go:
✔ Designed for low-bandwidth environments, using compressed X11 forwarding over SSH for efficient performance on slower links.
Limited support for OpenGL, 3D acceleration, or smooth video playback — not suitable for media-heavy tasks.
✔ Best used with lightweight desktop environments and basic GUI applications.

NoMachine:
✔ Engineered for high-performance streaming, with native support for HD video, OpenGL, and DirectX-based applications.
✔ Delivers smooth playback, hardware-accelerated rendering, and responsive interaction even over WAN.
✔ Ideal for use cases like video editing, remote design, or gaming.

X2Go excels in minimal resource environments, while NoMachine stands out in rich multimedia and graphics-intensive workflows.

 

2.5 Multi-User & Collaboration (Session Management)

X2Go:
✔ Supports multiple simultaneous users, each receiving a separate and isolated virtual desktop session.
✔ Natively Does not support shared sessions, session shadowing, broadcasting, screen control delegation, or real-time collaboration tools.
✔ More suited to individual access in multi-user server environments than interactive teamwork.

NoMachine:
✔ Offers both isolated and shared session modes, allowing users to connect independently or collaboratively.
✔ Features include screen sharing, shadow an active session, transfer control to another user, broadcast the session to multiple participants, view-only mode, and control handoff between users — ideal for remote support or pair work.
✔ Enables a seamless multi-user experience with intuitive session management.

X2Go supports concurrent users independently, while NoMachine adds collaborative features that enable real-time teamwork and screen sharing.

 

2.6 Scalability & Enterprise Features

X2Go:
✔ Offers no built-in support for clustering, session brokering, or load balancing — scalability must be handled manually through custom scripts and SSH configurations.
✔ Best suited for small teams, academic labs, or internal infrastructure where scaling needs are limited and static.

NoMachine:
✔ The Enterprise edition includes native support for multi-node clustering, session brokering, load balancing, and thin client infrastructure.
✔ Seamlessly integrates with LDAP/Active Directory, enabling centralized user and access management across large deployments.

X2Go fits modest, static setups with manual scaling, while NoMachine is built to scale professionally in large, dynamic enterprise environments.

 

2.7 Desktop Environment Compatibility

X2Go:
✔ Performs best with lightweight desktop environments like XFCE, LXDE, and MATE, ensuring smooth operation on limited resources.
✔ Compatibility with GNOME and KDE is possible but may require tuning or extensions, and can result in reduced performance or graphical glitches.
✔ Not recommended for environments with modern compositors or heavy graphical effects.

NoMachine:
✔ Provides broad and stable support for all major desktop environments including GNOME, KDE Plasma, Cinnamon, and even custom setups.
✔ No extra configuration typically required — delivers a consistent remote experience regardless of desktop UI.
✔ Suitable for both lightweight and full-featured desktops without compromise.

X2Go favors classic, resource-light desktops, while NoMachine adapts seamlessly to modern graphical environments with minimal overhead.

 

2.8 Device & Peripheral Support

X2Go:
✔ Does not support USB device redirection, meaning remote access to hardware peripherals like flash drives, scanners, or webcams is not possible.
Printer support is basic — available via client configuration, but lacks auto-detection or advanced features like bi-directional communication.
✔ Limited to core remote desktop functions, without deeper hardware integration.

NoMachine:
✔ Offers full USB device redirection, allowing access to storage devices, audio interfaces, smart cards, and scanners as if locally connected.
Printer redirection is seamless, with auto-discovery and driverless operation for most common setups.
✔ Especially valuable in remote work or enterprise environments where local device access is essential.

X2Go is functionally limited to display and file access, while NoMachine provides deep integration with local hardware for a true desktop-equivalent remote experience.

 

2.9 Input & Multi-Monitor Support

X2Go:
✔ Provides basic input handling, supporting standard keyboard and mouse interactions across remote sessions.
Multi-monitor setups are not natively supported — only one display is streamed at a time, with no ability to switch or span across screens.
✔ Suitable for straightforward, single-screen use cases.

NoMachine:
✔ Supports advanced input devices, including game controllers, drawing tablets, and multimedia keyboards — with full responsiveness and precision.
✔ Offers robust multi-monitor support, allowing users to mirror, select, or switch between multiple remote screens easily.
✔ Ideal for creative professionals, designers, or engineers requiring high input fidelity and multi-display workflows.

X2Go covers standard input needs for basic desktop access, while NoMachine empowers advanced device control and multi-display configurations for demanding remote work scenarios.

 

2.10 Audio & Clipboard

X2Go:
✔ Offers basic audio forwarding using PulseAudio, primarily effective on Linux and Windows clients; quality may vary depending on system setup.
Clipboard sync is limited to plain text only, with no support for image or formatted content transfer.
✔ Sufficient for basic office use, but limited for multimedia or design tasks.

NoMachine:
✔ Delivers native high-quality audio output and microphone input forwarding, suitable for video conferencing, editing, or streaming use cases.
Clipboard synchronization is full-featured, supporting text, images, and formatted content between local and remote systems.
✔ Enhances user experience for creative workflows, documentation, and team collaboration.

X2Go handles essential audio and clipboard tasks, but NoMachine offers a far richer experience for media-rich and interactive use environments.

  

2.11 File Transfer

X2Go:
✔ Uses SSHFS to mount the remote home directory onto the client machine, enabling secure file access.
✔ File transfer requires manual setup and path navigation, making it functional but less intuitive for non-technical users.
✔ Best suited for users familiar with SSH-based workflows.

NoMachine:
✔ Features a built-in GUI-based drag-and-drop file transfer, allowing users to move files effortlessly between remote and local systems.
✔ Operates natively across platforms with no additional configuration.
✔ Streamlined for speed and usability, ideal for both personal and enterprise file workflows.

X2Go offers secure but manual file access via SSHFS, while NoMachine simplifies the process with intuitive, native drag-and-drop support.

 

2.12 Session Recording

X2Go:
✔ ❌ Does not include native session recording functionality.
✔ Users would need to rely on external screen-recording tools (like ffmpeg or OBS) if session logging is required.
✔ Lacks built-in support for auditing, compliance, or instructional use cases.

NoMachine:
✔ ✅ Built-in session recording is available, allowing users to capture full remote sessions directly through the interface.
✔ Recordings are saved locally and can be used for training, auditing, debugging, or demo purposes.
✔ Simple controls make it accessible even for non-technical users.

X2Go omits session recording entirely, while NoMachine offers native, user-friendly tools ideal for professional environments where session playback is valuable.

 

12.13 Session Stability & Recovery

X2Go:
✔ Generally stable for lightweight workloads, especially with compatible desktop environments like XFCE or MATE.
✔ May experience instability under high load or when using more demanding DEs (like GNOME/KDE without tuning).
✔ Lacks built-in automatic session recovery — manual reconnects and restarts may be needed after interruptions.

NoMachine:
✔ Delivers consistent stability across platforms, including under high-performance use cases like multimedia or 3D rendering.
✔ Features auto-reconnect, error handling, and session recovery tools to maintain a seamless user experience.
✔ Handles dropped connections gracefully with minimal user disruption.

X2Go is stable for lighter workloads but lacks automatic recovery, while NoMachine ensures high reliability with built-in reconnection and fault tolerance mechanisms.

 

12.14 Monitoring & Admin Tools

X2Go:
✔ Provides basic logging at the system level — admins can monitor activity using tools like journalctl, SSH logs, or custom scripts.
✔ No built-in graphical interface for session tracking, resource usage, or centralized oversight.
✔ Requires manual log parsing and external monitoring solutions for advanced insight.

NoMachine:
✔ Offers a built-in admin interface with real-time session monitoring, active user tracking, and usage statistics.
✔ Admins can view connection history, session durations, and bandwidth usage directly within the GUI.
✔ Especially valuable for team management, troubleshooting, and auditing in business environments.

Conclusion: X2Go limits monitoring to system-level logs, whereas NoMachine delivers user-friendly, built-in tools for session visibility and administrative control.

 

2.15 Web Access & Clientless Connectivity

X2Go:
✔ Does not provide native web-based access — users must install the dedicated X2Go Client application to initiate a session.
✔ No browser-based or clientless option exists, limiting accessibility in environments where software installation is restricted.
✔ Suitable for internal setups where full client control is possible.

NoMachine:
✔ Includes Web Companion, allowing remote desktops to be accessed directly via a web browser with no client install required.
✔ Supports modern browsers and delivers full session functionality through HTTPS.
✔ Ideal for mobile users, temporary devices, or clientless workflows.

X2Go requires local client software for all connections, while NoMachine adds flexibility with browser-based access — making it far more adaptable for clientless or mobile scenarios.

 

2.16 Customization & Extensibility

X2Go:
✔ As a fully open-source solution, X2Go offers deep customization — users can modify components, integrate with other Linux tools, or automate workflows using scripts and open protocols.
✔ Ideal for sysadmins or developers who prefer fine-grained control over session handling, security policies, and deployment structure.
✔ Supports integration into larger open-source infrastructure (e.g., LDAP, FreeIPA, Ansible).

NoMachine:
✔ Provides a closed-source, turnkey experience focused on simplicity and consistency.
✔ Configuration is mostly GUI-driven, with limited extensibility or backend scripting options.
✔ Prioritizes ease of use, stability, and a uniform experience across platforms.

X2Go appeals to power users who need flexibility and open integration, while NoMachine is ideal for those wanting a streamlined, low-maintenance remote desktop solution.

 

#2.17 Ideal Use Case Summary

X2Go is ideal for:

  1. Linux-based environments requiring secure SSH remote desktop access.
  2. Lightweight desktops like XFCE, MATE, or LXDE where performance matters more than graphical features.
  3. Academic labs, internal dev teams, and sysadmin workflows where multi-user isolation and session persistence are critical.
  4. Users comfortable with manual setup who value open-source tools with minimal resource usage.

NoMachine is ideal for:

  1. Organizations needing cross-platform access, including support for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and web browsers.
  2. Multimedia-heavy or GPU-accelerated use cases, such as video editing, remote design, 3D modeling, and streaming.
  3. Remote support, live screen sharing, and collaboration workflows, including session handoff and view-only access.
  4. Enterprise-scale deployments that require centralized management, LDAP/AD integration, and session monitoring.

 

 

📌 Hope you found the content useful!

If you're looking for a reliable and high-performance Hong Kong VPS or a fully customizable Hong Kong Dedicated Server, we invite you to explore our hosting solutions.

🌐 Visit Us Today

 

📘 FAQ

❓ What is the main difference between X2Go and NoMachine?

✔️ X2Go is a Linux-focused, open-source remote desktop tool built for secure, SSH-based access with isolated virtual sessions. NoMachine, in contrast, is a cross-platform solution that supports multimedia streaming, collaboration, and mobile/web access — ideal for enterprise and multi-device workflows.

❓ Does either solution support Wake-on-LAN or remote power management?

✔️ NoMachine offers Wake-on-LAN in supported setups, enabling users to power on remote machines. ❌ X2Go lacks native support but can be extended using external tools or scripts.

❓ Can you print to a remote printer from the host machine?

✔️ NoMachine supports two-way printing — both remote-to-local and local-to-remote. ✔️ X2Go supports remote-to-local printing only via client-side forwarding.

❓ Is there support for multi-factor authentication (MFA)?

✔️ X2Go can use PAM modules (like Google Authenticator or Duo) via SSH for MFA. ✔️ NoMachine Enterprise supports MFA through system or directory integration (e.g., LDAP + MFA).

❓ Are there any licensing restrictions for commercial use?

✔️ X2Go is fully open-source under GPL and free for commercial use. ✔️ NoMachine is free for personal use but requires a commercial license for enterprise or business environments.

Comments are closed