π Table of Content
- Key Similarities Between SpaceFM and PCManFM
- Key Differences Between SpaceFM and PCManFM
- Features SpaceFM Offers That PCManFM Does Not
- Use Case Summary – Which One to Choose

SpaceFM and PCManFM both aim to simplify file management on Linux, but they take completely different paths to get there. One is a flexible powerhouse built for users who enjoy deep customization, while the other focuses on speed, simplicity, and staying lightweight.
Understanding these contrasting design goals helps you quickly decide which one aligns with your workflow.
What is SpaceFM?
SpaceFM is a highly flexible Linux file manager designed for users who like control and customization. Instead of acting like a basic folder browser, it feels more like a powerful workspace where you can open multiple panels, add your own tools, create actions, and shape the interface exactly the way you want. It works independently of any desktop environment and stays lightweight despite being feature-rich.
Key Features of SpaceFM
β Multi-Panel Layout
You can open up to four panels in one window, each with its own tabs. This makes comparing directories or moving files extremely easy.
β Extensive Customization
You can customize nearly everything — menus, toolbars, actions, shortcuts, colors, and behavior. It also supports scripts, so you can automate tasks.
β Custom Actions & Plugins
SpaceFM lets you add your own commands to the right-click menu. It also supports plugins for actions like bulk renaming, image tools, mounting and more.
β Strong Device & Mount Handling
It detects USB drives, external disks, and network shares directly. You can auto-mount devices, set rules, or trigger scripts when a device is inserted.
β Built-In Task Manager
File operations run in the background with a detailed task manager. You can pause, resume, or queue operations with full monitoring.
β Lightweight but Powerful
Even with advanced features, it stays efficient and doesn’t require heavy desktop dependencies.
β Optional Desktop Management
It can manage desktop icons and wallpaper, making it useful for window-manager-based setups.
What is PCManFM?
PCManFM is a fast and lightweight file manager commonly used in LXQt and LXDE desktops. It focuses on giving you a clean, simple, and responsive experience without unnecessary features. The goal is to help you browse files quickly, manage folders easily, and keep your system light, especially on older or low-resource machines.
Key Features of PCManFM
β Lightweight & Fast
Designed to start instantly and run smoothly even on minimal hardware. Perfect for low-RAM systems.
β Clean, Simple Interface
The layout is straightforward, with tabs, bookmarks, and basic navigation controls that make file browsing easy for anyone.
β Tabbed Browsing
You can open multiple folders in separate tabs, making it easier to switch between workspaces without clutter.
β Good LXQt/LXDE Integration
Works seamlessly with lightweight desktops, handling icons, trash, volume, and file associations properly.
β Device Auto-Mounting
It automatically detects removable devices like USB drives and mounts them cleanly using system backends like gvfs.
β Basic Customization Options
You can adjust icon size, view mode, single or double-click behavior, and toolbar preferences without complexity.
β Low Dependency Footprint
It uses minimal libraries and background services, keeping your system lean and responsive.
β Stable and Actively Maintained
Part of the LXQt project, so it receives regular updates, bug fixes, and improvements.
#1 Key Similarities Between SpaceFM and PCManFM
β Both are lightweight file managers
They are designed to stay fast and responsive without consuming large system resources, making them suitable for older hardware and minimal Linux setups.
β Both follow a clean, traditional layout
They use the classic file manager structure — sidebar, main folder view, toolbar, and menus — so even new users can start using them comfortably.
β Both support tabbed browsing
You can open multiple folders in tabs, switch quickly between them, and organize your workspace better.
β Both allow device auto-mounting
USB drives, external disks, and removable devices are detected and mounted through your system backends (gvfs, udisks, etc.).
β Both work independently of a full desktop environment
They do not require GNOME or KDE. You can use them with window managers like Openbox, Fluxbox, i3, etc.
β Both offer basic customization options
You can change icon sizes, view modes, toolbar preferences, click behavior, and default file actions.
β Both support root mode
You can open them as root (via pkexec, sudo, or built-in options) to manage system files when needed.
β Both are open source
Free to modify, inspect, and redistribute under open-source licenses.
β Both aim to stay lightweight but user-friendly
Neither is bloated, and both emphasize easy navigation and a straightforward user experience.
#2 Key Differences Between SpaceFM and PCManFM
2.1 Customization Level
SpaceFM:
Offers deep customization across almost every part of the interface — multiple panels, custom menus, user-defined actions, embedded scripts, plugins, keyboard shortcuts, and layout adjustments, letting you shape it exactly to your workflow.
PCManFM:
Provides only essential UI tweaks such as icon size, view modes, single/double-click choice, and toolbar visibility, keeping the experience simple but limited.
SpaceFM is good if you want full control, while PCManFM fits users who prefer a straightforward, no-setup environment.
2.2 Layout Flexibility
SpaceFM:
Supports a highly versatile layout with up to four independent panels in a single window, each containing its own set of tabs. This makes side-by-side comparisons, multi-directory work, and complex file operations far easier.
PCManFM:
Uses a simple single-pane layout with tab support. It keeps navigation clean and uncluttered but doesn’t offer multi-pane viewing or advanced workspace arrangements.
SpaceFM enables a multi-panel workspace for power users, while PCManFM focuses on a clean, single-view experience.
2.3 Extensibility
SpaceFM:
Allows you to extend functionality through plugins, user-defined actions, and custom scripts. You can add new tools, automate tasks, integrate external commands, and enhance the file manager far beyond its defaults.
PCManFM:
Does not provide a plugin system or advanced extension mechanisms. It offers only the built-in features with no way to add extra modules or scripted enhancements.
SpaceFM grows with your workflow through plugins and custom actions, while PCManFM stays minimal with no extension support.
2.4 Power-User Tools
SpaceFM:
Includes several advanced tools such as an embedded terminal, custom event handlers, detailed task queue control, and scriptable actions. These features let technical users automate workflows, manage operations more precisely, and work faster without switching applications.
PCManFM:
Offers essential file operations like copy, move, delete, and tabbed browsing. It does not provide built-in terminals, automation hooks, or advanced operation controls.
SpaceFM gives power users deeper control and automation options, while PCManFM sticks to basic file management.
2.5 Desktop Management
SpaceFM:
Includes an optional desktop manager that can handle desktop icons, wallpapers, and right-click menus. This makes it useful in lightweight window-manager setups where no desktop shell exists.
PCManFM:
Primarily functions as the default file manager inside LXDE/LXQt, where the desktop environment itself manages icons and wallpaper. It does not include its own standalone desktop management layer.
SpaceFM can act as a full desktop handler when needed, while PCManFM depends on the surrounding desktop environment for those features.
2.6 Device Handling
SpaceFM:
Offers advanced control over device detection and mounting through customizable handlers like udev, udevil, and pmount. It lets you automate mount rules, trigger scripts on device events, and choose exactly how external drives, network shares, or partitions are handled.
PCManFM:
Provides straightforward device mounting using standard system backends such as gvfs or udisks. It detects removable drives automatically but offers limited customization or mount behavior tuning.
SpaceFM gives you fine-grained control over how devices mount and behave, while PCManFM keeps things simple with basic automounting.
2.7 Learning Curve
SpaceFM:
Its large feature set, multi-panel layout, custom actions, scripting options, and deep configuration make it powerful but require time to understand. Users who enjoy tweaking will appreciate it, but beginners may feel overwhelmed at first.
PCManFM:
Designed with simplicity in mind, offering a clean interface and basic controls that most users can understand immediately. It’s easy to navigate without needing to explore advanced settings.
SpaceFM rewards users willing to learn, while PCManFM is instantly comfortable for beginners.
2.8 Maintenance & Updates
SpaceFM:
Development progresses slowly, with fewer releases, but the software remains stable and reliable. Its core features have matured over time, so updates tend to focus on minor fixes rather than major changes.
PCManFM:
Actively maintained within the LXQt project, receiving regular updates, bug fixes, and compatibility improvements. This ensures smoother integration with modern systems and continuous polishing.
SpaceFM is stable but updated infrequently, while PCManFM benefits from steady, ongoing maintenance.
#4 Features SpaceFM Offers That PCManFM Does Not
β Multi-panel layout – SpaceFM supports up to four panels; PCManFM offers only a single pane with tabs.
β Embedded terminal – SpaceFM includes a built-in terminal; PCManFM has no integrated terminal.
β Plugin support – SpaceFM extends features through plugins; PCManFM provides no plugin system.
β Custom actions & scripting – SpaceFM supports scriptable actions and automation; PCManFM allows only basic built-in actions.
β Advanced task queue – SpaceFM can pause, resume, reorder, and monitor file tasks; PCManFM uses a simple file operation dialog.
β Event handlers – SpaceFM triggers scripts on device or file events; PCManFM has no event-handling mechanism.
β UI design mode – SpaceFM lets you rebuild menus and rearrange UI elements; PCManFM has a fixed interface layout.
β Advanced mount handlers – SpaceFM supports udev, udevil, pmount, and custom rules; PCManFM relies only on gvfs/udisks for mounting.
β Panel linking – SpaceFM panels can mirror each other’s navigation; PCManFM does not support linked panels.
β Desktop management – SpaceFM can handle desktop icons and wallpaper; PCManFM depends on LXDE/LXQt for desktop handling.
β Detailed permission editing – SpaceFM offers more granular permission controls; PCManFM provides a simple permission dialog.
β Scripted bulk rename – SpaceFM supports batch renaming through scripts/plugins; PCManFM only offers basic rename.
β Extensive menu customization – SpaceFM allows fully customized context menus; PCManFM offers minimal menu adjustments.
β Integrated device rules – SpaceFM lets you define per-device behaviors; PCManFM has no rule-based device system.
β Background job logging – SpaceFM logs completed file operations; PCManFM keeps no operational logs.
β Custom file operation profiles – SpaceFM allows personalized copy/move behaviors; PCManFM uses fixed, standard operations.
β Built-in network protocol handlers – SpaceFM directly handles NFS, SMB, FTP, SSH, ISO through custom handlers; PCManFM depends on gvfs for all network mounts.
β Session-specific layout saving – SpaceFM can save/restore multi-panel layouts; PCManFM always starts with a simple default layout.
β Internal command builder – SpaceFM provides a tool to create advanced operations without scripting; PCManFM has no such feature.
β Recursive custom actions – SpaceFM can apply custom actions through nested folders; PCManFM does not support recursive custom actions.
β Parallel/sequential job control – SpaceFM lets you control how file tasks run; PCManFM runs tasks in a fixed, default manner.
#4 Use Case Summary – which one to choose?
If you want a powerful and highly customizable file manager, SpaceFM is the better choice. It fits users who need multi-panel layouts, advanced file operations, scripting, plugins, custom actions, and full control over device mounting or task automation. It also works great with lightweight window managers like Openbox, i3, or Fluxbox, especially when you want the file manager to handle desktop icons or wallpapers.
If you prefer something fast, simple, and lightweight, PCManFM is the better option. It fits users who only need straightforward file browsing, quick navigation, and basic operations without any configuration. It integrates perfectly with LXQt and LXDE and is ideal for older hardware, low-RAM systems, and users who want a clean interface without extra features.
In short, choose SpaceFM for power-user workflows and customization, and choose PCManFM for speed, simplicity, and low resource usage.
FAQ – SpaceFM vs PCManFM
1. What is the main difference between SpaceFM and PCManFM?
SpaceFM is a power-user file manager with multi-panel layouts, scripting, plugins, and deep customization, while PCManFM is a lightweight, straightforward file manager focused on speed and a clean single-pane experience.
2. Which one is better for low-end or older hardware?
PCManFM is a better fit for low-end or older hardware because it uses less memory and CPU, starts quickly, and keeps the interface minimal, while SpaceFM’s extra features can add a bit more overhead in comparison.
3. When should I prefer SpaceFM over PCManFM?
Choose SpaceFM when you need multi-panel workflows, embedded terminal, custom actions, advanced mount rules, and automation for complex file operations, especially if you are a developer, sysadmin, or power user.
4. When is PCManFM a better choice than SpaceFM?
PCManFM is a better choice when you want a fast, no-fuss file manager for everyday browsing, especially on LXQt/LXDE desktops or minimal systems where simplicity and low resource usage are more important than extra features.
5. Is SpaceFM a fork of PCManFM?
SpaceFM is not a direct fork of the modern PCManFM codebase; it is based on an older “PCManFM-Mod” variant and has since evolved into its own, independent project with a very different feature set and direction.
6. Can I install and use both SpaceFM and PCManFM on the same system?
Yes, you can install both on the same Linux system and even switch between them; one can be your default file manager while the other stays available for specific workflows or experiments.
7. Which integrates better with LXQt or LXDE?
PCManFM integrates more naturally with LXQt and LXDE because it is designed as their default file manager, handling desktop icons, trash, MIME associations, and system actions in a very seamless way.
8. Which one is safer and more stable for daily use?
Both are stable for daily use, but PCManFM benefits from continuous maintenance within the LXQt project, while SpaceFM focuses on mature, stable functionality with slower update cycles and more power-user options.
9. Does SpaceFM replace a desktop environment?
SpaceFM does not replace a full desktop environment, but its desktop management features (icons, wallpaper, context menu) make it a very useful companion for lightweight window-manager setups that do not provide a desktop layer by default.
10. If I am unsure, how should I decide between SpaceFM and PCManFM?
If you enjoy tweaking, automation, and multi-panel productivity, start with SpaceFM; if you just want a fast, clean, and resource-friendly file manager that works immediately, start with PCManFM and keep SpaceFM as an optional tool for advanced tasks.