What is Manjaro?

Manjaro is a user-friendly Linux distribution based on Arch Linux that combines cutting-edge software with stability and ease of use. It provides a rolling release model, pre-configured desktop environments (like XFCE, KDE, GNOME), and powerful tools like Pamac for managing packages. While it inherits Arch’s flexibility and speed, Manjaro simplifies the installation and maintenance process, making it accessible to both intermediate users and those new to Arch-based systems.

✅ Pros and Key features of Manjaro Linux:

1. Rolling Release Updates
   Continuously updated system ensures you always have the latest software and kernel.
2. Arch-Based Core
   Built on Arch Linux, offering speed, flexibility, and access to advanced features.
3. Multiple Desktop Environments
   Officially supports XFCE, KDE Plasma, and GNOME – all preconfigured for out-of-the-box usability.
4. Pamac Package Manager
   GUI tool for managing software, updates, AUR access, and flatpaks – beginner-friendly.
5. AUR Support
   Full access to the Arch User Repository for thousands of community-contributed packages.
6. MHWD (Manjaro Hardware Detection)
   Automatically detects and configures drivers, including proprietary GPU drivers.
7. Pre-installed Software
   Comes with essential tools and applications – ready to use after installation.
8. Graphical Installer (Calamares)
   Easy-to-use, modern installer simplifies system setup and partitioning.
9. Custom Kernels
   Users can easily install and switch between multiple Linux kernel versions.
10. Strong Community and Documentation
    Active forums, helpful guides, and partial access to the Arch Wiki for troubleshooting. 

❌ Cons of Manjaro

1. Not Ideal for Beginners
   While friendlier than Arch, some maintenance still requires command-line skills and Linux familiarity.
2. Package Stability Concerns
   Being rolling release, occasional update issues or broken packages may occur if not cautious.
3. Slower Security Patch Delivery
   Compared to Ubuntu or Fedora, security updates might be delayed due to testing.
4. AUR Risks
   Installing from AUR can introduce unverified or broken packages if not carefully reviewed.
5. Limited Commercial Support
   Unlike Ubuntu, there’s no corporate backing or enterprise-grade support.

What is Ubuntu?

Ubuntu is a popular, Debian-based Linux distribution developed by Canonical, designed to be user-friendly, stable, and suitable for desktops, servers, and cloud environments. It features a regular release cycle, with Long-Term Support (LTS) versions offering five years of updates. Ubuntu comes with the GNOME desktop by default and includes essential applications out-of-the-box, making it ideal for beginners, developers, and enterprise use. 

✅ Pros and Key features of Ubuntu

1. Debian-Based Stability
   Built on Debian, offering a reliable and well-tested core system.
2. Regular Release Cycle
   New version every 6 months; Long-Term Support (LTS) every 2 years with 5 years of updates.
3. GNOME Desktop (Default)
   Modern, user-friendly interface ideal for both newcomers and professionals.
4. Extensive Software Repositories
   Access to thousands of packages via APT, Snap, and Flatpak (optional).
5. Snap Package Support
   Canonical’s own containerized packaging system for easier app updates and distribution.
6. Excellent Hardware Compatibility
   Pre-installed drivers and firmware support for a wide range of laptops, desktops, and peripherals.
7. Security Updates & Patching
   Enterprise-grade patch delivery with optional live kernel patching via Canonical Livepatch.
8. Wide Platform Support
   Available for desktops, servers, cloud, IoT (Ubuntu Core), and WSL (Windows Subsystem for Linux).
9. Beginner-Friendly Installer
   Ubiquity and Subiquity installers make it easy to set up Ubuntu with guided partitioning and user setup.
10. Strong Community & Canonical Support
    Active forums, massive documentation base, and optional commercial support from Canonical.

❌ Cons of Ubuntu

1. Snap Controversy
   Snap packages can be slower to launch and less customizable; some users prefer Flatpak or traditional APT.
2. Heavier System Requirements
   GNOME desktop can feel sluggish on low-end or older hardware without optimization.
3. Limited Control
   Compared to Arch or Gentoo, less suited for users who want full system customization from scratch.
4. Telemetry Enabled by Default
   Some versions collect minimal system usage data unless manually disabled.
5. Enterprise Influence
   Canonical's decisions (like promoting Snap) may not always align with community preferences.

#2 – Difference - System Architecture

Manjaro:

Built on Arch Linux, it retains Arch’s speed and flexibility but adds user-friendly layers like pre-configured desktops, hardware detection, and tested updates.

Ubuntu:

Based on Debian, it provides a robust, stable core and is widely recognized for long-term support (LTS) and compatibility with enterprise environments.

➤ Result: Manjaro simplifies Arch for easier access and custom setups; Ubuntu refines Debian into a stable, ready-to-use platform suited for both personal and professional use.

#3 Difference - Release Model

Manjaro:

Follows a semi-rolling release model — users receive frequent software and kernel updates, but only after internal testing to reduce breakage risk.

Ubuntu:

Uses a fixed release cycle — Long-Term Support (LTS) versions every 2 years with 5 years of updates, and non-LTS releases every 6 months for newer features.

➤ Result: Manjaro offers access to newer packages with moderate safety; Ubuntu prioritizes predictable updates and long-term stability.

#4 Difference - Package Management

Manjaro:

Utilizes Pacman as the core package manager and provides access to the AUR (Arch User Repository) — a vast collection of community-maintained packages, including the latest and niche software.

Ubuntu:

Uses APT for handling .deb packages, backed by a vast, stable repository and broad compatibility with third-party and proprietary software.

➤ Result: Manjaro excels in cutting-edge and community-contributed packages; Ubuntu emphasizes stability and broad software support.

#5 Difference Desktop Environments

Manjaro:

Offers official editions with XFCE, KDE Plasma, and GNOME, each finely tuned for performance. Also includes community spins with desktops like i3, Cinnamon, and Budgie.

Ubuntu:

Ships with GNOME by default. Official flavors include Kubuntu (KDE), Xubuntu (XFCE), Lubuntu (LXQt), and others, each maintained separately.

➤ Result: Both offer diverse desktop options, but Manjaro’s editions are pre-optimized for lighter and smoother performance out-of-the-box.

#6 Beginner Friendly

Manjaro:

Makes Arch Linux more accessible with graphical installers, preconfigured desktops, and user-friendly tools — but still requires some Linux knowledge for troubleshooting and maintenance.

Ubuntu:

Built for simplicity and approachability, with a clean interface, guided installer, and minimal post-install setup, making it ideal for newcomers and casual users.

➤ Result: Ubuntu offers a smoother, plug-and-play experience; Manjaro appeals to users ready to explore and learn beyond the basics.

#7 Difference - Software Availability

Manjaro:

With access to the AUR, Manjaro users can install a vast range of open-source and bleeding-edge software, including niche tools not found in official repos.

Ubuntu:

Backed by Canonical, it’s the most widely supported Linux distro by commercial vendors — major apps, games, and third-party software are often built with Ubuntu compatibility in mind.

➤ Result: Manjaro shines for open-source and community-driven software access; Ubuntu excels in proprietary and commercial software support.

#8 Difference - Security & Updates

Manjaro:

Delivers frequent updates, including the latest kernels and software, but applies a short delay for internal testing to reduce the risk of instability — balancing freshness with caution.

Ubuntu:

Follows a structured security model, with timely updates, LTS support, and enterprise-grade patching policies, including live kernel patching (via Canonical Livepatch for LTS users).

➤ Result: Ubuntu is ideal for environments where long-term security and stability are critical; Manjaro offers newer packages while maintaining a safety buffer.

#9 Performance

Manjaro:

Known for its lightweight footprint, especially when paired with XFCE, i3, or Openbox. It boots faster, uses less RAM, and runs smoothly even on older hardware.

Ubuntu:

Uses the GNOME desktop, which is more resource-intensive. It performs well on modern systems but may feel sluggish on low-spec machines without tweaks.

➤ Result: Manjaro offers better performance on a wider range of hardware; Ubuntu trades some speed for visual polish and feature-richness.

#10 Difference - Developer & Power User Friendly

Manjaro:

Appeals to users who want deep system control, access to the latest development tools, and rolling updates. Ideal for scripting, compiling, and experimenting with new technologies via the AUR and cutting-edge kernels.

Ubuntu:

Widely adopted in cloud platforms, DevOps pipelines, and enterprise environments. Seamless integration with WSL, Docker, and CI/CD tools makes it a go-to for professional development and deployment.

➤ Result: Manjaro is great for hands-on tinkerers and Arch enthusiasts; Ubuntu shines for developers needing reliability, compatibility, and infrastructure integration.

#11 Gaming

Manjaro:

Offers newer kernels, Mesa drivers, and GPU firmware, which can translate to improved FPS and performance in newer titles. Great for gamers who want the latest Vulkan support and bleeding-edge enhancements.

Ubuntu:

Prioritized by major gaming platforms like Steam and Lutris. It provides a more plug-and-play setup, with reliable Proton support and compatibility with proprietary drivers and launchers.

➤ Result: Manjaro delivers better raw performance with up-to-date components; Ubuntu offers easier game setup and broader compatibility with gaming ecosystems.

#12 Community & Support

Manjaro:

Backed by an active community with dedicated forums, helpful tutorials, and partial reliance on the Arch Wiki, which is one of the most comprehensive Linux resources — though it assumes technical knowledge.

Ubuntu:

Supported by a massive global user base, with extensive official documentation, community Q&A (Ask Ubuntu, forums), and professional support from Canonical for enterprises.

➤ Result: Ubuntu provides broader, more accessible support for all skill levels; Manjaro’s support is strong but geared more toward technically inclined users.

#13 Target Audience

Manjaro:

Tailored for intermediate users, Linux enthusiasts, and those curious about Arch Linux but looking for a more accessible, pre-configured experience with rolling updates.

Ubuntu:

Designed for beginners, general desktop users, developers, and organizations needing a stable platform for enterprise servers, cloud deployments, and WSL environments.

➤ Result: Manjaro attracts tinkerers and performance seekers; Ubuntu appeals to users who value stability, ease, and universal compatibility.