Tables of Content
- Background
- Preinstalled Apps
- Release Model
- System Requirements
- Performance
- Networking Tools
- Software and Package Management
- Security Features
- Community and Support
- Compatibility
- Customization and Usability
- Certifications
- Backup and Restore

Fedora and AlmaLinux serve distinct purposes in the Linux ecosystem. Fedora is a cutting-edge, community-driven operating system backed by Red Hat, designed for developers, tech enthusiasts, and those who want to test the latest technologies. It features the GNOME desktop environment by default and provides a fast-paced release cycle with short-term support, making it ideal for experimenting with the newest Linux advancements like Wayland and Btrfs.
AlmaLinux, on the other hand, is a stable, enterprise-grade Linux distribution developed as a 1:1 binary-compatible alternative to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). It is tailored for production servers, businesses, and long-term deployment scenarios where reliability and extended support (10 years) are critical. Unlike Fedora, which focuses on innovation, AlmaLinux prioritizes stability, security updates, and seamless compatibility with enterprise software stacks.
Background
Fedora and AlmaLinux have different histories and release models, reflecting their unique purposes. Here's an overview of their background and version histories:
Fedora:
- Fedora was created in 2003 as a community-driven project, supported by Red Hat. It serves as the upstream, cutting-edge development platform for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL).
- Fedora releases a new version approximately every 6 months, maintaining a short lifecycle of about 13 months for each version. This fast-paced cycle makes it ideal for users who want the latest software and features.
- Version History (recent major versions):
- Fedora 38: Released April 18, 2023
- Fedora 37: Released November 15, 2022
- Fedora 36: Released May 10, 2022
- Fedora 35: Released November 2, 2021
- Fedora 34: Released April 27, 2021
AlmaLinux:
- AlmaLinux was launched in 2021 as a free, open-source, 1:1 binary-compatible replacement for CentOS, after CentOS shifted to the CentOS Stream model.
- AlmaLinux is governed by the AlmaLinux OS Foundation, a community-driven organization that ensures long-term stability and enterprise-grade support.
- AlmaLinux versions align with RHEL’s release schedule and lifecycle, offering up to 10 years of support for each version.
- Version History (recent major versions):
- AlmaLinux 9.3: Released May 16, 2023
- AlmaLinux 9.2: Released May 10, 2023
- AlmaLinux 9.1: Released November 16, 2022
- AlmaLinux 8.8: Released May 11, 2023
- AlmaLinux 8.7: Released November 11, 2022
- AlmaLinux 8.6: Released May 12, 2022
Preinstalled Apps
Fedora and AlmaLinux differ in the range and purpose of preinstalled applications, reflecting their focus on either desktop usability or server stability. Here’s a detailed breakdown:
Fedora:
- Fedora Workstation comes with a modern and feature-rich set of preinstalled applications designed for desktop users and developers.
- Default Applications:
- GNOME Desktop Utilities: Includes tools like Files (Nautilus) for file management, GNOME Terminal, and Settings.
- LibreOffice Suite: Preinstalled for productivity tasks such as document editing, spreadsheets, and presentations.
- Firefox Browser: Included as the default web browser.
- Media Applications: Fedora ships with Rhythmbox for music and Videos (Totem) for video playback.
- Software Center: GNOME Software is included to help users easily manage applications and updates.
- Developer Tools: Fedora includes gcc, Python, and other development libraries by default, catering to programmers.
AlmaLinux:
- AlmaLinux is a server-oriented distribution and comes with a minimal set of preinstalled applications. This allows users to customize the system according to their specific use case.
- Default Applications:
- Command-Line Utilities: Essential tools like Bash, nano, and vi are included for server management.
- Minimal GUI (Optional): If selected during installation, AlmaLinux may include a basic GNOME desktop environment, but no productivity or media applications are preinstalled.
- YUM/DNF Package Manager: Used for installing and managing additional software.
- Networking Tools: Includes tools like curl, wget, and OpenSSH for managing network connections and remote access.
- System Utilities: Tools for managing logs, partitions, and services are included, such as systemctl and journalctl.
Release Model
Fedora and AlmaLinux differ significantly in their release strategies, catering to distinct use cases. Here's a concise breakdown:
-
Fedora:
- Releases every 6 months with short support cycles (13 months per version).
- Focuses on innovation and bleeding-edge technologies (e.g., latest Linux kernels, Wayland, Btrfs).
- Prioritizes development and testing environments.
- Not ideal for long-term stability in production.
-
AlmaLinux:
- Matches Red Hat Enterprise Linux's lifecycle with a 10-year support period.
- Provides security patches and bug fixes without frequent major changes.
- Stability-focused for enterprise servers and critical systems.
- Ideal for businesses needing consistency and long-term reliability.
In summary, Fedora is for those who embrace rapid advancements, while AlmaLinux is suited for those who value stability and long-term support.
System Requirements
Fedora and AlmaLinux have different hardware requirements due to their focus on different use cases. Below is a simple breakdown of their minimum and recommended system specifications:
-
Fedora:
- Minimum Requirements:
- Processor: 1 GHz or faster x86_64 or ARM CPU.
- Memory: 2 GB of RAM.
- Storage: 20 GB of free disk space.
- Graphics: Any GPU supporting OpenGL 2.0 for basic desktop functionality.
- Recommended Requirements:
- Processor: Multi-core x86_64 CPU with 2 GHz or higher clock speed.
- Memory: 4 GB or more for smoother multitasking.
- Storage: At least 50 GB of free disk space for updates and additional software.
- Graphics: Modern GPU supporting Wayland and high-resolution displays.
-
AlmaLinux:
- Minimum Requirements:
- Processor: 1 GHz x86_64 processor.
- Memory: 1 GB of RAM for text-based installations (2 GB for graphical installations).
- Storage: 10 GB of free disk space for a basic server setup.
- Graphics: Not required for server use; basic VGA support for graphical installations.
- Recommended Requirements:
- Processor: 2 GHz or faster multi-core x86_64 processor.
- Memory: 4 GB or more for server workloads; 8 GB or more for heavy multitasking.
- Storage: At least 20 GB of free space for server setups; 50 GB or more for database or application servers.
- Graphics: Generally unnecessary for servers; basic graphics sufficient if GUI tools are used.
Key Differences:
- Fedora has higher requirements for modern desktop features like Wayland, GNOME, and graphical applications.
- AlmaLinux is optimized for lightweight server setups with a focus on efficient resource utilization and headless operation (no GUI needed).
Performance
Fedora and AlmaLinux differ in their performance focus, reflecting their target audiences and use cases. Here’s a detailed comparison:
-
Fedora:
- Resource Usage: Fedora is optimized for modern hardware, often requiring more RAM and CPU power to run its default GNOME desktop environment smoothly. GNOME, while feature-rich, is known to be heavier compared to lightweight desktop environments.
- Speed: Fedora prioritizes cutting-edge technologies like Wayland and the latest kernels, which enhance performance on modern hardware. However, on older systems, this can lead to slower response times due to higher resource demands.
- Efficiency: Fedora’s frequent updates ensure better optimization for newer hardware, but this can occasionally introduce instability or bugs, impacting consistent performance in production environments.
-
AlmaLinux:
- Resource Usage: AlmaLinux is designed for stability and efficiency, making it lighter on system resources. Its focus is on running server-grade workloads efficiently, without requiring high-end hardware. It’s also suitable for older hardware, especially in text-based or minimal installations.
- Speed: AlmaLinux avoids unnecessary background services and prioritizes core functionalities, making it faster for server tasks and stable for sustained workloads.
- Efficiency: With a 10-year support cycle, AlmaLinux ensures updates are stable and well-tested, providing consistent and reliable performance without frequent changes that might disrupt enterprise environments.
Key Differences:
- Fedora excels in environments with modern hardware, leveraging the latest technologies for speed and innovation.
- AlmaLinux focuses on resource efficiency and stability, making it ideal for servers or older hardware with limited resources.
Aspect |
Fedora |
AlmaLinux |
Boot Time |
Faster on modern hardware due to cutting-edge kernels |
Moderate, optimized for stable server performance |
Memory Usage (Idle) |
~1.5 GB (GNOME desktop environment) |
~500 MB (Minimal server installation) |
CPU Usage (Idle) |
Slightly higher due to background services and updates |
Lower, minimal background processes for stability |
Kernel Performance |
Latest kernel for optimal hardware support |
Stable, well-tested kernels for reliability |
Desktop Responsiveness |
Smooth on modern hardware, slower on older hardware |
Lightweight if GUI installed, primarily server-focused |
Server Workload Efficiency |
Less efficient due to frequent updates |
High efficiency with optimized server workloads |
Update Frequency |
High, with constant kernel and software updates |
Low, stability-focused with critical patches |
Virtual Machine Performance |
Excellent for testing and development environments |
Superior for running stable production workloads |
Compatibility with Old Hardware |
Limited due to resource-intensive environment |
Excellent, works well with older systems |
Networking Tools
Fedora and AlmaLinux offer a variety of networking tools, but their focus on stability versus innovation shapes their approach to networking. Here’s a comparison of their networking tools and capabilities:
Fedora:
- Focus: Fedora prioritizes cutting-edge networking technologies to support modern use cases and developer experimentation.
- Default Tools:
- NetworkManager: A user-friendly tool for managing wired, wireless, and VPN connections, ideal for desktop environments.
- Firewalld: A dynamic firewall that simplifies network security management with zone-based configurations.
- Latest Protocols: Fedora includes support for modern protocols like IPv6, QUIC, and WireGuard, ensuring compatibility with the latest technologies.
- Experimental Networking: Fedora often introduces experimental networking tools and features, such as eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter) for advanced traffic filtering and monitoring.
AlmaLinux:
- Focus: AlmaLinux emphasizes stability and enterprise-grade tools, ensuring reliability in production systems.
- Default Tools:
- NetworkManager: Also included, but configured for consistent and reliable network setups in enterprise environments.
- IPSec and VPN Support: Built-in support for enterprise-grade VPNs and secure communications, including StrongSwan for IPSec.
- Firewall Tools: Includes Firewalld, but with a focus on preconfigured security policies suited for server environments.
- Legacy Tools: Tools like ifconfig and network-scripts are supported for legacy systems and backward compatibility.
Software and Package Management
Fedora and AlmaLinux use similar package management tools, but their focus and approach to software differ significantly. Here's a breakdown:
-
Fedora:
- Fedora relies on the DNF package manager, which is modern, fast, and capable of handling dependencies efficiently. It supports advanced features like parallel downloads and delta updates, making software installations and updates faster.
- It prioritizes cutting-edge software and includes the latest versions of applications and libraries. For example, Fedora often ships with the newest GNOME desktop, kernels, and developer tools, making it ideal for developers and those who want to test or work with the latest technologies.
- Fedora’s software repositories include a vast range of open-source applications, and users can also add third-party repositories like RPM Fusion for additional software.
- Its frequent updates ensure users have access to the latest features, but these updates may occasionally introduce instability in a rapidly changing environment.
-
AlmaLinux:
- AlmaLinux also supports the DNF package manager as a default, alongside YUM for legacy compatibility. YUM works seamlessly with older systems and scripts, ensuring stability in enterprise environments.
- AlmaLinux prioritizes stability over cutting-edge software, providing versions of applications and libraries that are well-tested and suited for long-term use. This makes it perfect for production servers where reliability is key.
- The software repositories in AlmaLinux are tightly aligned with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), offering enterprise-grade software and updates. Security patches and bug fixes are delivered in a controlled manner to maintain stability.
- Unlike Fedora, AlmaLinux doesn’t focus on including the latest versions of applications, instead favoring reliability and backward compatibility for critical workloads.
Security Features
Fedora and AlmaLinux both focus on providing secure systems, but their approaches differ based on their target audience and purpose. Here's a closer look at their security mechanisms, updates, and certifications:
-
Fedora:
- Fedora emphasizes security by default and incorporates advanced mechanisms like SELinux (Security-Enhanced Linux), which enforces strict access controls to protect the system from unauthorized access.
- It uses the latest Linux kernel with built-in security improvements, ensuring users benefit from cutting-edge security features as soon as they are released.
- Fedora also supports Firewalld, a dynamic firewall management tool, to help users configure and control network security easily.
- Updates are frequent and include the latest security patches, ensuring vulnerabilities are addressed quickly. However, this rapid update cycle may introduce occasional risks if changes are not fully tested.
- Fedora includes tools like OpenSSL and GnuPG for encryption and secure communications, making it an excellent choice for developers and testers who need modern security tools.
-
AlmaLinux:
- AlmaLinux also integrates SELinux as a core security feature, but it focuses on maintaining stable policies for enterprise use rather than implementing the latest experimental settings.
- It provides long-term, well-tested security patches through its alignment with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), ensuring stability and reliability. Updates are carefully managed to avoid disruptions in production environments.
- AlmaLinux offers compliance with enterprise security standards like FIPS (Federal Information Processing Standards), which is essential for organizations working in regulated industries such as government or finance.
- With features like auditd for system auditing and AIDE (Advanced Intrusion Detection Environment) for file integrity monitoring, AlmaLinux prioritizes consistent and robust security for server and enterprise environments.
- AlmaLinux is a solid choice for businesses due to its compatibility with enterprise security tools like IPSec, ensuring secure communication over networks.
Community and Support
Fedora and AlmaLinux provide different types of community and support systems, reflecting their target audiences and use cases.
-
Fedora:
- Fedora has a large and active community supported by Red Hat, which ensures strong backing for updates, discussions, and problem-solving.
- Users can rely on the Fedora Project’s forums, mailing lists, and IRC channels for troubleshooting and sharing ideas. There is a wealth of user-contributed content, making it easier for newcomers to find solutions.
- Fedora’s official documentation is comprehensive, covering everything from basic installation to advanced usage of technologies like SELinux, Flatpak, and the Wayland display server.
- The community thrives on collaboration and innovation, making Fedora ideal for developers, testers, and those who want to contribute to open-source projects. However, because of its fast-paced development cycle, not all resources are tailored for long-term stability.
-
AlmaLinux:
- AlmaLinux benefits from a strong, focused community driven by enterprises and businesses. It was developed as a replacement for CentOS, and much of its community comprises IT professionals, system administrators, and companies.
- AlmaLinux provides excellent support channels, including official forums, community Slack, and a growing GitHub repository for collaboration. Paid support can also be obtained through third-party providers, making it attractive for organizations with specific support requirements.
- Documentation is straightforward, focusing on practical deployment, server management, and enterprise-grade stability. It mirrors Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), so users can often rely on RHEL-based resources as well.
- AlmaLinux is designed for production environments, with long-term stability and detailed guides, which are particularly useful for enterprises and professionals managing critical systems.
Compatibility
Fedora and AlmaLinux support a variety of architectures and environments, but their focus differs based on their intended use cases. Here's how they compare:
-
Fedora:
- Supported Architectures: Fedora supports a wide range of architectures, including x86_64, ARM (aarch64), PowerPC, and s390x. This makes it versatile for use across different types of hardware, from desktops to specialized devices.
- Cloud Environments: Fedora is optimized for cloud usage with prebuilt Fedora Cloud Base images, which are lightweight and designed for virtualization platforms like AWS EC2, Google Cloud, and Azure.
- Containers: Fedora excels in container-based environments. It provides Fedora CoreOS, a lightweight, immutable operating system specifically for running containers using tools like Podman, CRI-O, and Kubernetes.
- Virtual Machines (VMs): Fedora works well in VMs, especially for testing and development, offering features like QEMU, KVM, and libvirt for virtualization support. Its cutting-edge kernel and frequent updates ensure excellent performance in virtualized environments.
-
AlmaLinux:
- Supported Architectures: AlmaLinux supports x86_64 and ARM (aarch64) architectures, focusing on compatibility with server-grade hardware and enterprise setups. While its architecture support is narrower compared to Fedora, it is highly reliable for standard server environments.
- Cloud Environments: AlmaLinux provides official cloud images for platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, ensuring compatibility for deploying production servers. Its alignment with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) ensures smooth integration in enterprise cloud environments.
- Containers: AlmaLinux is a great choice for running containers in stable production environments. It supports Docker, Podman, and Kubernetes, with an emphasis on long-term reliability over experimental features.
- Virtual Machines (VMs): AlmaLinux performs exceptionally well in VMs, offering enterprise-grade stability for workloads on platforms like VMware, Proxmox, and Hyper-V. Its compatibility with enterprise tools ensures a seamless experience for system administrators.
Customization and Usability
Fedora and AlmaLinux offer distinct experiences when it comes to customization and usability, tailored to their respective audiences. Here’s a closer look:
-
Fedora:
- Default Desktop Environment: Fedora ships with the GNOME desktop environment by default, offering a clean and modern interface. GNOME emphasizes simplicity and productivity with features like the Activities Overview and dynamic workspaces.
- Customization: Fedora provides a high degree of flexibility. Users can install alternative desktop environments like KDE Plasma, XFCE, Cinnamon, or others by choosing Fedora spins. It also supports themes, extensions, and tweaks through tools like GNOME Tweaks and extensions.gnome.org.
- Ease of Use: Fedora is user-friendly for those familiar with Linux, but its cutting-edge nature and frequent updates might feel overwhelming for new users. It's particularly suitable for developers or enthusiasts who prefer experimenting with the latest software and settings.
- Development Tools: Fedora comes with developer-friendly tools pre-installed, such as dnfdragora for package management and access to the latest IDEs and compilers, enhancing its usability for technical users.
-
AlmaLinux:
- Default Desktop Environment: AlmaLinux does not come with a default desktop environment as it is primarily server-oriented. However, for those requiring a GUI, environments like GNOME, KDE Plasma, or XFCE can be manually installed, with GNOME being the most commonly used option.
- Customization: AlmaLinux focuses on stability, so its customization options prioritize reliability over advanced tweaks. While users can install themes and tools, it is generally configured for enterprise workloads, limiting the scope for frequent changes.
- Ease of Use: AlmaLinux is designed for professionals who need a predictable and consistent operating system. Its simplicity lies in its stability—system administrators can deploy and manage it with minimal hassle. However, desktop usability might feel limited compared to Fedora unless additional configurations are performed.
- Enterprise Tools: AlmaLinux excels in usability for server environments, offering tools like Cockpit for web-based management and robust command-line utilities for remote configurations.
Certifications
Certifications are a critical aspect when comparing Fedora and AlmaLinux, especially for enterprise environments that require compliance with industry standards. Here’s how the two distributions differ in terms of certifications:
Fedora:
- Focus: Fedora is not designed with enterprise certifications in mind. Its primary focus is on innovation, experimentation, and cutting-edge technologies.
- Certifications:
- Fedora does not hold certifications like FIPS (Federal Information Processing Standards) or other enterprise-grade compliance standards.
- It is primarily a community-supported distribution and lacks the formal testing and validation required for government or regulatory environments.
AlmaLinux:
- Focus: AlmaLinux is specifically designed to meet enterprise needs, including certifications required for government, finance, and other regulated industries.
- Certifications:
- FIPS Compliance: AlmaLinux supports FIPS 140-2 compliance, ensuring secure cryptographic modules for industries with stringent security requirements.
- RHEL Compatibility: Since AlmaLinux is a 1:1 binary-compatible clone of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), it aligns with the same certifications and regulatory standards that RHEL adheres to.
- STIG (Security Technical Implementation Guide): AlmaLinux aligns with STIG compliance guidelines, making it suitable for military and government systems.
Backup and Restore
Fedora and AlmaLinux approach backup and restore differently, reflecting their distinct focus on cutting-edge desktop environments and enterprise stability. Here’s a detailed comparison:
Fedora:
- Backup Features:
- Btrfs Snapshots: Fedora uses Btrfs as the default file system, which natively supports snapshots. These snapshots allow users to take point-in-time backups of the file system, useful for rolling back after a failed update or accidental deletion.
- GNOME Backup Tools: Fedora includes user-friendly tools like Deja Dup (integrated with GNOME) for automated backups to external drives or cloud services (Google Drive, etc.).
- Third-Party Tools: Fedora supports a wide range of third-party tools like Restic, Timeshift, and BorgBackup, providing flexibility for advanced users.
- Restore Options:
- Snapshots can be easily rolled back using Btrfs, making it ideal for recovering from system-level issues.
- Deja Dup simplifies restoring user data from external drives or cloud storage.
- Developers can leverage tools like Git or rsync for version control and granular recovery of files.
AlmaLinux:
- Backup Features:
- XFS Snapshots: While AlmaLinux uses XFS as the default file system, which doesn’t natively support snapshots, it can integrate with LVM (Logical Volume Manager) to enable snapshot functionality for backups.
- Enterprise Tools: Supports industry-standard backup solutions like Bacula, Veeam, and Commvault, designed for enterprise environments and large-scale deployments.
- Command-Line Utilities: Provides built-in tools like rsync and tar for manual backups, which are simple yet powerful for scripting and automation.
- Remote Backups: AlmaLinux excels in supporting remote backup options via NFS (Network File System), Samba, or SSH-based tools for secure off-site data storage.
- Restore Options:
- Restores can be handled through enterprise tools or custom scripts, ensuring full control over the recovery process.
- For critical systems, snapshots created with LVM or other third-party solutions allow quick restoration of server states.
- AlmaLinux’s compatibility with RHEL ensures seamless integration with enterprise disaster recovery solutions.
Aspect |
Fedora |
AlmaLinux |
File System |
Btrfs with built-in snapshot support |
XFS (supports snapshots via LVM) |
Backup Tools |
GNOME tools like Deja Dup and third-party options |
Enterprise-grade tools like Veeam, Bacula |
Restore Simplicity |
Easy desktop recovery via GUI tools or Btrfs snapshots |
Focus on manual and automated recovery for servers |
Remote Backup Support |
Limited but supported via third-party tools |
Extensive options for secure, scalable remote backups |
Final words :
In summary, Fedora is perfect for those who want modern tools, easy backups, and snapshots for personal or development use. On the other hand, AlmaLinux is a reliable choice for businesses needing robust, enterprise-grade backup and restore solutions for critical systems.
FAQ
1. What is the main difference between Fedora and AlmaLinux?
Fedora is a cutting-edge Linux distribution focused on the latest technologies, while AlmaLinux is a stable, long-term support (LTS) OS designed for enterprise and server environments.
2. Which one is better for stability?
AlmaLinux offers 10 years of support per release, making it ideal for long-term stability. Fedora receives frequent updates, making it more suited for development and testing.
3. How do their update cycles compare?
- Fedora: New versions every 6 months.
- AlmaLinux: Follows RHEL’s stable release cycle with long-term support.
4. Who should use Fedora, and who should use AlmaLinux?
- Fedora: Best for developers, testers, and those who want the latest software.
- AlmaLinux: Ideal for businesses, enterprises, and production servers.
5. How do they handle package management?
Both use DNF package manager, but Fedora has newer software, while AlmaLinux focuses on stability.
6. Which one is better for servers?
AlmaLinux is the best choice for enterprise and cloud servers due to its long-term support.
7. How does Fedora’s cutting-edge nature affect reliability?
Fedora’s frequent updates bring the latest features but may introduce occasional system-breaking changes.
8. Does AlmaLinux support Fedora’s latest software?
No, AlmaLinux focuses on stability and does not include Fedora’s latest experimental features.
9. How do they compare in system performance?
Fedora is optimized for newer hardware, while AlmaLinux provides steady performance for enterprise workloads.
10. Can I use Fedora or AlmaLinux for personal desktop use?
Fedora is great for personal desktops with modern features, while AlmaLinux is mainly optimized for servers.
11. What desktop environments do they support?
- Fedora: Defaults to GNOME but supports KDE, XFCE, and others.
- AlmaLinux: Primarily GNOME, with limited desktop customization.
12. Can I run Fedora or AlmaLinux in the cloud?
Yes, both are available on AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure. AlmaLinux is preferred for enterprise cloud deployments.
13. How does security compare between Fedora and AlmaLinux?
AlmaLinux offers enterprise-grade security with FIPS compliance, while Fedora provides rapid security updates.
14. Which one has better enterprise support?
AlmaLinux is enterprise-ready with full RHEL compatibility.
15. Can I migrate from Fedora to AlmaLinux?
No direct upgrade path exists; a fresh install is required.
16. Is Fedora or AlmaLinux better for software development?
Fedora is ideal for developers due to its latest compilers and libraries.
17. How do Fedora and AlmaLinux compare for containerization?
Both support Docker, Podman, and Kubernetes, but AlmaLinux is optimized for enterprise deployments.
18. Which one is better for long-term use?
AlmaLinux is the best choice for long-term stability, while Fedora requires frequent upgrades.
19. Can I dual-boot Fedora and AlmaLinux?
Yes, but Fedora’s frequent updates might require extra boot management.
20. Final Verdict: Which one should you choose?
- Choose Fedora for cutting-edge software, frequent updates, and development.
- Choose AlmaLinux for enterprise, stability, and long-term server support.