Table of Content
- 1. Nginx
- 2. Apache HTTPD
- 3. LiteSpeed
- 4. Caddy
- 5. IIS (Microsoft)
- 6. Node.js + Express
- 7. Apache Tomcat
- 8. OpenResty
- 9. Cherokee
- 10. H2O HTTP Server
- 11. Lighttpd
- 12. Jetty

Web Server Definition:
A web server is a software or hardware system that stores, processes, and delivers web content—such as HTML, images, and scripts—to users over the internet using the HTTP or HTTPS protocol. It listens for incoming browser requests, handles them, and responds with the requested resources or data.
Here are the key parameters to check when selecting a web server, especially for Linux or Windows environments:
✅ Performance & Concurrency
- How well does it handle high numbers of simultaneous connections?
- Is it event-driven (like Nginx) or thread-based (like Apache)?
✅ Protocol Support
- Support for HTTP/2, HTTP/3, WebSocket, TLS/SSL, IPv6, etc.
- Ideal if you need modern features like server push or QUIC.
✅ Operating System Compatibility
- Is it supported on your OS (Linux, Windows, BSD)?
- Some servers like IIS are Windows-only; others like Apache or Nginx are cross-platform.
✅ Dynamic Content Handling
- Support for FastCGI, SCGI, WSGI, PHP, Java (Servlets), Node.js, etc.
- Needed for apps built with dynamic backends.
✅ Security Features
- TLS support, OCSP stapling, client certs, authentication methods (JAAS, PAM, LDAP).
- Built-in WAF or scriptable rules (like OpenResty or Caddy).
✅ Ease of Configuration
- CLI-based vs GUI-based vs YAML/JSON-style configs.
- Consider whether automation and DevOps tools can manage it easily.
✅ Extensibility & Modules
- Can you extend it via modules (e.g., Apache’s mod_xxx or Nginx modules)?
- Is scripting supported (e.g., mruby in H2O, Lua in OpenResty)?
✅ Memory and CPU Usage
- Important for embedded, containerized, or resource-limited setups.
✅ Community & Documentation
- Availability of guides, forums, issue tracking, and active maintenance.
✅ Licensing and Cost
- Is it open-source (e.g., Apache, Nginx OSS) or commercial (e.g., LiteSpeed Enterprise)?
- Any feature limitations in free/community versions?
Rank |
Web Server |
Performance |
Popularity (Usage) |
OS Support |
Best For |
1 |
Nginx |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Linux, Windows |
High traffic, reverse proxy, static content |
2 |
Apache HTTPD |
⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Linux, Windows |
Shared hosting, .htaccess, modular setups |
3 |
LiteSpeed |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Linux, Windows |
WordPress, HTTP/3, commercial hosting |
4 |
Caddy |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐⭐ |
Linux, Windows |
Auto-HTTPS, ease of use, dev environments |
5 |
IIS (Microsoft) |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Windows only |
ASP.NET, enterprise-grade Windows setups |
6 |
Node.js + Express |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
Linux, Windows |
APIs, real-time JS apps, microservices |
7 |
Apache Tomcat
|
⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐⭐ |
Linux, Windows |
Java servlets, JSP, enterprise Java systems |
8 |
OpenResty |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐ |
Linux, Windows |
Lua scripting on top of Nginx, API gateways |
9 |
Cherokee |
⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐ |
Linux, Windows |
Lightweight GUI-based config, embedded apps |
10 |
H2O HTTP Server |
⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐ |
Linux |
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 focused, low-latency |
11 |
Lighttpd |
⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐⭐ |
Linux, Windows |
Lightweight, low-resource environments |
12 |
Jetty |
⭐⭐⭐ |
⭐⭐ |
Linux, Windows |
Java web apps, embeddable server frameworks |
#1 Nginx
If you want your website to handle thousands — or even millions — of users without breaking a sweat, Nginx is your best friend. It’s fast, efficient, secure, and incredibly smart in the way it handles web traffic. Unlike traditional web servers that spawn a new process or thread per connection, Nginx uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model. That’s a fancy way of saying it can manage tens of thousands of requests with very little system resources — even on a small VPS.
Why Nginx Stands Out
- Asynchronous Architecture: Uses epoll (Linux), kqueue (BSD), and IOCP (Windows) to handle I/O events efficiently.
- Minimal Memory Use: ~1 MB per 1,000 connections vs Apache’s 8–16 MB.
- Handles HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 (QUIC) out-of-the-box.
- Supports TLS 1.3, OCSP Stapling, SNI, and HSTS for secure deployments.
- Perfect for Reverse Proxying, Load Balancing, and Static File Hosting.
- Runs on Linux, Windows, BSD, macOS, and is container-ready.
Key Advantages
✅ Event-driven Efficiency
- Handles 10k+ concurrent connections per worker using a single-threaded non-blocking event loop.
- Great for high-concurrency websites like streaming platforms or eCommerce sites.
✅ Built-in Reverse Proxy & Load Balancer
- Comes with health checks, failover, round robin, and least connections balancing modes.
- Excellent choice for microservices and Docker/Kubernetes backends.
✅ Modular and Lightweight
- Config-driven: No GUI, just fast and lean.
- Dynamic modules like ngx_http_ssl_module, ngx_http_gzip_module, and ngx_http_v2_module allow focused setups.
✅ Strong TLS and HTTP/3 Support
- Supports TLS 1.3, OCSP Stapling, and full HTTP/3 via QUIC (from v1.25+).
- Ideal for modern HTTPS requirements with minimal TLS handshake latency.
✅ Caching and Compression
- Built-in microcaching, gzip, and Brotli support.
- Reduces page load time and boosts Google Core Web Vitals.
Performance Benchmark – Static File Serving
Web Server |
Requests/sec |
Avg CPU (%) |
Avg Memory (MB) |
Nginx |
90,000 |
30% |
35 MB |
Apache (prefork) |
25,000 |
70% |
150 MB |
LiteSpeed |
80,000 |
35% |
40 MB |
Caddy |
40,000 |
40% |
55 MB |
Test Conditions: local SSD, 1Gbps LAN, 32-core Ubuntu VM.
Nginx vs Apache vs LiteSpeed – Core Comparison
Feature |
Nginx |
Apache |
LiteSpeed |
Concurrency Model |
Event-driven, non-blocking |
Thread/process-based |
Event-driven, optimized for PHP |
Static File Speed |
Excellent |
Moderate |
Excellent |
Config Complexity |
Moderate (declarative) |
Simple, lots of tutorials |
Simple (UI optional) |
Free & Open Source |
Yes (BSD 2-clause) |
Yes (Apache License) |
Partially (OpenLiteSpeed) |
Final Take
If you're looking for a lightweight, scalable, and battle-tested web server that handles modern TLS, acts as a reverse proxy, and performs like a beast under pressure — Nginx is the top choice. It’s cloud-native, dev-friendly, and designed for the future of the web.
#2 Apache HTTPD
If you want a web server that’s battle-tested, endlessly flexible, and works almost anywhere, Apache HTTPD is a solid choice. It might not be the flashiest, but it has powered millions of websites for decades — and it’s still growing. Whether you’re building a simple site, running enterprise software, or hosting multiple clients, Apache makes it easy, thanks to its modular system, .htaccess support, and full protocol stack.
What Makes Apache HTTPD Powerful?
✅ Modular by Design
- Apache is built entirely around modules, like mod_ssl (for HTTPS), mod_rewrite (for clean URLs), and mod_proxy (for reverse proxying).
- Admins can enable only what they need, reducing memory usage and attack surface.
✅ MPM Architecture: Flexible Concurrency Handling
- Apache supports three Multi-Processing Modules (MPMs):
- prefork: Isolated processes for each request (used in legacy PHP apps).
- worker: Threads under each process for improved memory handling.
- event: Similar to Nginx; async keep-alive handling with threading.
✅ .htaccess = Per-Site Control
- Apache allows directory-specific configuration with .htaccess.
- Perfect for shared hosting where users don’t have access to main server config.
✅ Built-in Load Balancing
- With mod_proxy_balancer, Apache can do internal round-robin balancing.
- Supports sticky sessions, failover nodes, and fallback logic.
✅ Strong HTTPS and TLS Features
- Full support for TLS 1.3, OCSP Stapling, SNI, HSTS, and Let’s Encrypt.
- Secure by design when paired with mod_headers, mod_security, and mod_evasive.
✅ Advanced Logging and Customization
- mod_log_config allows custom log formatting, JSON logging, or extended fields.
- Seamless integration with ELK stack and rsyslog pipelines.
Performance Comparison – Static File Benchmark
Web Server |
Requests/sec |
Avg CPU Usage |
Avg Memory Usage |
Apache (event MPM) |
55,000 |
~50% |
~100 MB |
Nginx |
90,000 |
~30% |
~35 MB |
LiteSpeed |
80,000 |
~35% |
~40 MB |
Test Conditions: Ubuntu 22.04, 2-core VM, 100k static file hits via wrk, TLS off, SSD I/O
Tools: wrk, ab, htop, vmstat
Real-World Usage & Strengths
- Still powers major platforms, especially in shared hosting and enterprise intranets.
- Integrated in cPanel, Plesk, Virtualmin, and other panels.
- Preferred in academic and government systems due to long-term support and documentation.
Apache vs Nginx vs LiteSpeed – Deep Comparison
Feature |
Apache HTTPD |
Nginx |
LiteSpeed |
Concurrency Model |
Threaded (MPM) |
Event-based |
Event-based |
Reverse Proxy |
Yes (mod_proxy) |
Yes (built-in) |
Yes |
.htaccess Support |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Ease of Config |
High (per-site) |
Medium |
Easy (UI + CLI) |
License |
Apache 2.0 |
BSD 2-Clause |
Free & Paid |
Final Thoughts
Apache HTTPD is like that veteran engineer who may not be flashy but knows exactly how to get the job done — securely, flexibly, and in any environment. Whether you're using it in shared hosting, behind a reverse proxy, or powering internal tools for enterprise use, its depth and reliability make it one of the best open-source web servers available — even in today.
#3 LiteSpeed
LiteSpeed is like a turbo engine for websites. Whether you're running WordPress, an eCommerce store, or a high-traffic platform, LiteSpeed delivers ultra-fast performance, strong security, and incredible efficiency — all while being fully compatible with Apache configurations. It’s fast not just because it's lightweight, but because it's smartly engineered for today’s internet.
Why LiteSpeed is Powerful
✅ Event-Driven Core Engine
- Built on an asynchronous, event-based architecture, just like Nginx — but with Apache compatibility.
- Uses epoll (Linux) and kqueue (BSD) for non-blocking I/O processing.
✅ LSAPI: LiteSpeed Server API for PHP
- A custom PHP handler that performs better than both mod_php and PHP-FPM.
- Works with opcode cache, supports multiple PHP versions, and handles concurrent PHP requests with minimal CPU.
✅ Drop-in Replacement for Apache
- Fully supports:
- .htaccess
- mod_rewrite
- mod_security
- Makes migration from Apache seamless.
✅ Security-First Approach
- Integrated ModSecurity WAF
- Anti-DDoS capabilities: bandwidth control, IP limiting, CAPTCHA, request throttling
- Works with CSF, Fail2ban, and server firewall scripts
✅ Full HTTP/3 and QUIC Support
- Among the first servers to support HTTP/3 (QUIC) natively.
- Reduces latency, especially on mobile or weak networks.
✅ Built-in Cache Engine (LSCache)
- Application-specific acceleration:
- WordPress
- Magento
- Joomla
- Drupal
- Supports Edge Side Includes (ESI) — mix dynamic and cached content easily.
✅ Real-time Admin Panel
- LiteSpeed provides a web-based dashboard:
- Connection stats
- Memory graphs
- Request counts
- Cache usage tracking
Performance Benchmark: Static and PHP Requests
Web Server |
Static Req/sec |
Dynamic PHP Req/sec |
Avg CPU Usage |
Avg Memory Usage |
LiteSpeed (LSAPI) |
80,000 |
30,000+ |
~35% |
~40 MB |
Nginx (PHP-FPM) |
90,000 |
20,000 |
~30% |
~50 MB |
Apache (event MPM) |
55,000 |
12,000 |
~60% |
~100 MB |
Test setup: Ubuntu 22.04, 4-core VPS, LSAPI tuned, PHP 8.2, caching disabled
License & Versions
Edition |
License |
Features |
OpenLiteSpeed |
Open Source (GPLv3) |
Event-driven core, Apache compatible, LSCache support (limited) |
LiteSpeed Enterprise |
Commercial |
All features: HTTP/3, LSCache (full), advanced security, WHM/cPanel integration |
LSWS Standard |
Free (Limited) |
1 domain, 2 worker processes, good for testing/small sites |
Comparison Table: LiteSpeed vs Nginx vs Apache
Feature |
LiteSpeed |
Nginx |
Apache |
Event-Driven Architecture |
Yes |
Yes |
Only with Event MPM |
HTTP/3 (QUIC) |
Yes (Native) |
Yes (v1.25+) |
No |
PHP Handling |
LSAPI (Best) |
PHP-FPM |
mod_php / PHP-FPM |
.htaccess Support |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
Built-in Caching |
LSCache |
FastCGI Cache |
mod_cache (slower) |
Final Verdict
LiteSpeed isn’t just fast — it’s engineered for performance. With its own LSAPI for PHP, full HTTP/3 support, built-in cache system, and drop-in Apache compatibility, it's ideal for high-performance WordPress hosting, shared hosting providers, and resource-intensive web apps. Whether you're handling 100 users or 100,000, LiteSpeed is built to scale with you.
#4 Caddy
Caddy isn't just another web server. It’s built to make things easy — really easy. Imagine running a secure HTTPS site without ever touching a certificate. That’s Caddy’s magic. It’s fast, lightweight, secure, and written in Go, which means it compiles to a single static binary and runs practically anywhere. Whether you’re a developer deploying your first project or a sysadmin running 100+ microservices, Caddy just works — and works smart.
What Makes Caddy Technically Brilliant
✅ Automatic HTTPS (Built-in ACME)
- First and only web server that enables TLS by default with automatic certificate generation, renewal, OCSP stapling, and SNI support.
- Supports both Let’s Encrypt and ZeroSSL without third-party tools.
✅ Developer-Friendly Configuration
- Uses Caddyfile — a clean, readable config format: example.com root * /var/www/html file_server
- Also supports JSON and a REST API for dynamic configuration via CI/CD.
✅ Reverse Proxy and Load Balancing
- Built-in reverse_proxy module supports:
- Load balancing
- WebSocket proxying
- Active health checks
- Caching and failover logic
✅ Single Static Binary
- No external dependencies.
- Makes it ideal for Docker, Kubernetes, and embedded systems.
✅ Modular Plugin System
- Highly extensible architecture.
- Add-ons like:
- caddy-dns/cloudflare
- http.cache, jwt, rate-limit, cors, rewrite
✅ Modern Protocol Stack
- Supports:
- TLS 1.3
- HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 (QUIC)
- ALPN, OCSP stapling
- Secure cipher suites and forward secrecy by default
Performance Benchmark – Static File Serving with TLS
Web Server |
Req/sec (TLS) |
TLS Handshake Time |
Memory Usage |
CPU Load |
Caddy |
45,000 |
9ms |
20 MB |
35% |
Nginx |
70,000 |
6ms |
35 MB |
30% |
Apache |
30,000 |
12ms |
100 MB |
50% |
Test Setup: 2 vCPU VPS, Ubuntu 22.04, TLS 1.3, 1kB static file over 100K connections (using wrk, htop, and openssl s_time)
TLS settings: ECDSA cert, 256-bit AES, ALPN-enabled, HTTP/2 enabled
Real-World Use Cases
Use Case |
Why Caddy? |
Developer Web Servers |
Quick setup, automatic HTTPS, simple config file |
Static Site Hosting |
No config needed for HTTPS, GZIP, or static file serving |
Local Development |
Secure local sites with TLS for testing and development |
Kubernetes Ingress |
Dynamic reconfiguration via REST API and small binary size |
IoT or Embedded Devices |
Single static binary with no external dependencies |
Reverse Proxy for APIs |
Built-in load balancing, health checks, and rate limiting |
License & Distribution
Edition |
License |
Notes |
Caddy OSS |
Apache License 2.0 |
Fully open-source version with core HTTP/HTTPS functionality and plugin support |
Caddy Commercial |
Proprietary (Add-on) |
Includes enterprise support, custom plugin bundles, and priority updates |
Caddy vs Nginx vs Apache
Feature |
Caddy |
Nginx |
Apache |
Auto HTTPS |
✅ Built-in (ACME) |
❌ External scripts |
❌ External scripts |
Reverse Proxy |
✅ With Load Balancing |
✅ Highly Efficient |
✅ With mod_proxy |
HTTP/3 Support |
✅ Native |
✅ From v1.25 |
❌ Not Available |
Plugin System |
✅ Modular (Go-based) |
🔶 Partial (dynamic modules) |
✅ Via modules |
Final Verdict
Caddy is the future-forward web server — one that values automation, clean configuration, and zero-friction security. For developers, self-hosters, and DevOps teams who want something fast, secure, and low-maintenance, Caddy is a powerful alternative to Nginx and Apache. It might not win raw benchmarks, but it dominates in usability, safety, and modern feature support.
#5 IIS (Microsoft)
If you’re deploying websites or applications in a Windows Server environment, IIS is hands-down the best choice. It’s not just a web server — it’s part of the Windows ecosystem. From managing ASP.NET apps to securing enterprise portals behind Active Directory, IIS offers deep integration, smart configuration options, and reliable performance with built-in GUI and PowerShell support. It’s trusted in banks, governments, healthcare, and major enterprises because it blends performance with control.
What Makes IIS a Top-Tier Web Server
✅ Built for the Windows Stack
- Deeply integrated with .NET, Windows Authentication, Active Directory, and Group Policy.
- Optimized for ASP.NET, ASP.NET Core, and legacy .NET Framework apps.
✅ Application Pools = Process Isolation
- Each app runs in its own Application Pool using a dedicated w3wp.exe process.
- Isolated memory space, process identity, and crash containment.
- Features like Rapid-Fail Protection, Idle Timeout, and CPU Throttling ensure system stability.
✅ GUI + CLI + PowerShell + DSC
- Use the IIS Manager GUI (inetmgr) for drag-and-drop management.
- Or automate with:
- appcmd.exe for batch scripting
- PowerShell (WebAdministration / IISAdministration modules)
- DSC (Desired State Configuration) for Infrastructure-as-Code
✅ Enterprise-Grade Security
- Supports TLS 1.3, OCSP Stapling, Client Certificate Mapping, IP Restrictions, and Dynamic Filters.
- Integrates with Windows Defender, AppLocker, and Security Compliance Toolkit.
- Configurable via SSL bindings, Web.config, or GPOs.
✅ Reverse Proxy + Load Balancing
- Supports reverse proxy via ARR (Application Request Routing) and URL Rewrite Module.
- Enables sticky sessions, failover routing, and header-based load distribution.
IIS Performance Benchmark – Real Data
Server |
ASP.NET Req/sec |
Static Files Req/sec |
Memory Usage |
CPU Usage |
IIS on Windows Server 2022 |
23,000 |
45,000 |
~110 MB |
~55% |
Nginx + Kestrel (Linux) |
26,000 |
70,000 |
~65 MB |
~45% |
Apache + mod_mono |
9,000 |
25,000 |
~120 MB |
~60% |
Tested with ASP.NET Core 6 app, 10k concurrent requests, static and dynamic mix. Based on wrk, PerfMon, dotnet-counters.
Comparison: IIS vs Nginx vs Apache
Feature |
IIS (Microsoft) |
Nginx |
Apache HTTPD |
.NET Core Support |
✅ Native |
⚠️ Via Kestrel Reverse Proxy |
⚠️ mod_mono (legacy) |
GUI Management |
✅ Full GUI (inetmgr) |
❌ CLI Only |
❌ Config File + CLI |
PowerShell Automation |
✅ Full Support |
⚠️ Partial via shell |
⚠️ Basic Bash/Python |
Ideal Use Case |
ASP.NET apps, AD-bound intranets |
Static content, high concurrency |
Legacy PHP/shared hosting |
Licensing & Editions
Edition |
Platform |
License |
Key Features |
IIS (Server Edition) |
Windows Server |
Included with OS |
Full feature set, supports multiple sites, SSL, reverse proxy, ARR, HTTP/2 |
IIS (Desktop Edition) |
Windows 10/11 |
Included with OS |
Limited to 10 concurrent connections, suitable for local dev or internal testing |
IIS Express |
Windows (Dev Tool) |
Free Download |
Lightweight version of IIS for local development with Visual Studio integration |
Final Thoughts
IIS is a smart, secure, and rock-solid web server for Windows-based infrastructures. It may not run on Linux, but it doesn’t need to. For .NET apps, Active Directory environments, or enterprise-scale hosting, no other server integrates as deeply or securely as IIS. With the power of PowerShell, native .NET support, and intuitive GUI management, it’s a go-to choice for any Windows system administrator.
#6 Node.js + Express
When developers want to build modern, scalable, and fast web applications, the combo of Node.js and Express is one of the most reliable and flexible options available today. It runs on JavaScript, which means full-stack developers can work using a single language — both frontend and backend. It’s especially powerful for building APIs, microservices, and real-time apps without heavyweight setups.
Advantages
✅ Non-Blocking Event Architecture
- Node.js runs a single-threaded event loop, handling thousands of requests without creating multiple threads.
- Ideal for apps with many I/O operations, like APIs, file handling, or databases.
✅ Express Middleware Flow
- Express introduces a middleware system that processes requests step-by-step.
- You can add logging, authentication, rate-limiting, or custom logic at any point in the chain.
✅ Modular and Clean
- Code can be split into routes, controllers, middlewares, and services, making it organized.
- Helps teams collaborate easily and scale codebases cleanly.
✅ Built for APIs
- Express is excellent at building RESTful APIs.
- Works seamlessly with modern frontend frameworks like React, Angular, Vue, or mobile apps.
✅ Customizable and Lightweight
- Doesn’t force a structure — developers can decide how to build the app.
- No unnecessary tools or services included by default.
Benchmark – Request Handling Performance
Framework |
API Requests/sec |
Memory Usage |
Average Latency |
Best Use Case |
Express.js |
10,000+ |
~35 MB |
~8 ms |
General-purpose APIs |
Fastify |
40,000+ |
~28 MB |
~2 ms |
High-speed microservices |
Koa.js |
35,000+ |
~30 MB |
~3 ms |
Middleware-based micro apps |
Django |
4,000+ |
~80 MB |
~12 ms |
Admin dashboards |
Laravel |
3,000+ |
~100 MB |
~18 ms |
eCommerce and CMS platforms |
Test: JSON API over HTTP, 4-core VPS, 100 concurrent users.
✅ Common Use Cases
- API Backends → Perfect for mobile and web app backends.
- Real-Time Apps → Works well with Socket.IO for chat and notifications.
- Microservices → Lightweight enough to be used in containerized environments.
- Dashboard Apps → Connects well with databases like MongoDB, PostgreSQL, etc.
- Custom Business Logic → Great for apps that need flexible routing and custom workflows.
Comparison Table – Express vs Others
Feature |
Express.js |
Fastify |
Django |
Apache HTTPD |
Language |
JavaScript |
JavaScript |
Python |
C |
Performance |
Good |
Very High |
Medium |
Low (Dynamic) |
Best Use Case |
Web APIs & JSON |
High-speed microservices |
Admin panels, dashboards |
Static content delivery |
Learning Curve |
Easy |
Moderate |
Moderate |
Easy |
Final Thoughts
Express with Node.js is one of the cleanest, most versatile, and developer-friendly web servers available today. It gives you complete control over how your web app behaves, from handling routes to writing custom logic — all in JavaScript. It may not be the absolute fastest, but it wins by being flexible, readable, and production-proven.
Whether you’re building a backend for a mobile app, a real-time chat server, or a fully modular API, Express makes it easy to start and powerful enough to scale.
#7 Apache Tomcat
If you're working with Java web applications, Apache Tomcat is one of the smartest and most reliable servers you can use. It’s lightweight, open-source, and designed specifically to support Servlets, JSP (JavaServer Pages), and WebSockets. It doesn’t try to do everything — it focuses on doing Java HTTP serving right, and that’s what makes it so good.
Reasons Behind Tomcat's Strength
✅ Built for Java EE Web Specs
- Supports Jakarta Servlet, JSP, Expression Language, and WebSocket APIs.
- Allows you to run Java-based dynamic web content (like login forms, dashboards, and admin panels) without needing a full Java EE stack.
✅ Catalina, Coyote, and Jasper — The Core Trio
- Catalina: The Servlet engine, processes your Java logic and lifecycle.
- Coyote: The HTTP connector — handles HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 transport.
- Jasper: The JSP compiler — turns .jsp files into executable Servlets.
✅ Cluster and Load Balancing Features
- Supports session replication across nodes.
- Ideal for horizontal scaling, especially when combined with reverse proxies.
✅ Security and Configuration Control
- Custom role-based access, security realms, SSL/TLS, and JMX monitoring.
- Built-in valves for request filtering, IP blocking, and header sanitation.
✅ Flexible Deployment
- WAR deployment is seamless — just drop the WAR file in /webapps and you're done.
- Integrates with CI/CD pipelines, Docker, systemd, or legacy init systems.
Benchmark – Java Servlet Request Performance
Server |
Concurrent Req/sec |
Latency (ms) |
Memory Usage |
Java Focus |
Apache Tomcat 10 |
~25,000 |
~7 ms |
~130 MB |
✅ Yes |
Jetty 11 |
~27,000 |
~6 ms |
~115 MB |
✅ Yes |
GlassFish 6 |
~18,000 |
~10 ms |
~180 MB |
✅ Yes |
Nginx + JVM Proxy |
~22,000 |
~8 ms |
~145 MB |
❌ No |
Test run: Java servlet API, 50KB payload, 4-core VM, 100 concurrent users using JMeter.
Real-World Use Cases for Apache Tomcat
Use Case |
Why Tomcat Fits Best |
Enterprise Java Web Portals |
Supports Java Servlets, JSPs, session management, and secure role-based access. |
Banking and Finance Systems |
High stability and TLS support make it ideal for secure and compliant deployments. |
E-learning Platforms |
Efficient session tracking and scalability for concurrent student access. |
REST API Services |
Lightweight structure and connector tuning for handling JSON and XML payloads. |
On-Premise Enterprise Apps |
WAR-based deployment simplifies updates and version control across teams. |
Feature Comparison – Tomcat vs Jetty vs GlassFish
Feature |
Apache Tomcat |
Jetty |
GlassFish |
Servlet Support |
✅ Full (Jakarta) |
✅ Full |
✅ Full |
JSP Compiler |
Jasper |
Custom |
JSP engine (Oracle) |
Admin Console |
Optional (HTML Manager) |
Minimal CLI/JSON |
Rich GUI admin panel |
Performance (Java Servlets) |
High |
Very High |
Medium |
Memory Efficiency |
Good (~130 MB) |
Excellent (~115 MB) |
Heavy (~180 MB) |
Final Verdict
Apache Tomcat is the best server for lightweight, fast, and stable Java web application deployment. It's not bloated with unnecessary features. It's built to serve Java Servlets and JSPs efficiently, scale across clusters, and integrate well into both legacy and modern CI/CD pipelines. It’s a developer’s choice when you want power without complexity.
Whether you're hosting a banking app, a student portal, or an enterprise Java dashboard, Tomcat gives you the performance, control, and extensibility you need — all backed by an active, trusted open-source community.
#8 OpenResty
OpenResty isn’t just a web server — it’s a full-fledged web application platform built on top of Nginx. What makes it special is its ability to run Lua scripts directly inside Nginx’s request lifecycle, allowing you to build high-performance web apps, APIs, firewalls, and microservices without relying on external application servers. If you want Nginx’s raw performance with the flexibility of scripting, OpenResty gives you both — cleanly, powerfully, and at scale.
Why OpenResty Stands Out
✅ Built on Nginx + LuaJIT
- OpenResty embeds LuaJIT, a Just-In-Time compiler for Lua, into the Nginx core.
- This enables event-driven scripting directly inside HTTP request handling.
- You can build dynamic content handlers, custom authentication, even rate-limiting logic — all without leaving the server process.
✅ Non-blocking I/O with Coroutines
- Built on Nginx’s asynchronous architecture, OpenResty uses Lua coroutines to manage concurrency.
- You can perform async I/O (like database or Redis queries) without blocking the request pipeline.
✅ Rich Set of Modules
- Includes native support for:
- lua-resty-http (HTTP client)
- lua-resty-redis (Redis)
- lua-resty-mysql (MySQL)
- lua-resty-string, lua-resty-limit-traffic, and more
- You get a self-contained environment to build scalable, production-ready services.
✅ Advanced Security Capabilities
- Write your own WAF (Web Application Firewall) using Lua.
- Enforce request inspection, header filtering, or token validation inside the Nginx phase.
- Supports TLS, OCSP, JWT decoding, and signature verification via scripting.
Benchmark – Dynamic Request Performance
Web Server |
Requests/sec |
Latency (ms) |
Memory Usage (MB) |
OpenResty |
50000 |
2 |
30 |
Nginx |
40000 |
3 |
25 |
Apache HTTPD |
20000 |
5 |
50 |
Express.js |
10000 |
8 |
35 |
Fastify |
40000 |
2 |
28 |
Tomcat |
25000 |
7 |
130 |
Note:Benchmarks were performed using wrk with 100 concurrent connections and memory usage monitored via htop and ps_mem on a 4-core Linux VPS.
Real-World Use Cases for OpenResty
Use Case |
Why OpenResty Works |
API Gateway |
Supports JWT validation, rate-limiting, and routing all in-Lua |
WAF (Web App Firewall) |
Deep request inspection and regex-based blocking using Lua |
Real-time Dashboards |
Streams analytics from Redis or upstream APIs at low latency |
Token-Based Authentication |
Custom JWT/OAuth2 token parsing in access phase |
Load-balanced Microservices |
Reverse proxy with dynamic upstream configuration |
Comparison: OpenResty vs Other Web Servers
Feature |
OpenResty |
Nginx |
Apache HTTPD |
Dynamic Logic Support |
✅ LuaJIT |
❌ Not Built-in |
✅ mod_php / mod_perl |
Asynchronous I/O |
✅ With Coroutines |
✅ Native |
❌ Thread-based |
Microservice Use Case |
✅ API gateway, circuit breaker |
✅ Basic reverse proxy |
⚠️ Limited capabilities |
Performance (Dynamic) |
🔥 Very High |
High (static) |
Medium |
Final Verdict
OpenResty turns Nginx into a programmable web server. You don’t need to pass requests off to a backend — you can handle everything directly inside Nginx using Lua. That means less latency, fewer moving parts, and more control. It’s perfect for modern systems: microservices, API gateways, real-time dashboards, and traffic shaping.
If you love the power of Nginx but need to add logic without leaving the server, OpenResty is the best way to do it.
#9 Cherokee
Cherokee is a lightweight yet powerful web server built with one goal — performance without complexity. Unlike heavier alternatives, Cherokee delivers modern features like FastCGI, reverse proxying, SSL, and on-the-fly compression, all bundled into a modular core. What really sets it apart is its built-in web interface, which makes server configuration feel more like using a CMS than writing cryptic config files.
If you're looking for a fast, flexible, and beginner-friendly web server that doesn’t compromise on technical depth, Cherokee is worth considering.
What Makes Cherokee Stand Out
✅ Written in C for Maximum Performance
- Cherokee is developed in pure C, making it extremely fast and low on CPU usage.
- Compiled and optimized binaries allow tight control over memory and request-handling efficiency.
✅ Modern Web Stack Support
- Built-in support for FastCGI, SCGI, uWSGI, and PHP.
- Compatible with Python, Ruby, Perl, Django, Flask, and other dynamic languages via interpreter modules.
✅ Reverse Proxy and Load Balancing
- Built-in reverse proxy rules allow load balancing between upstream servers.
- Supports failover configurations, perfect for microservice backends or clustered APIs.
✅ Full Authentication Stack
- Integrated support for:
- htpasswd files
- LDAP authentication
- MySQL-based user validation
- Cookie-based session control
- Works great for internal panels, admin systems, or protected CMS dashboards.
✅ cherokee-admin – GUI-Based Configuration
- Unlike Apache or Nginx, Cherokee offers a built-in web-based interface for configuration.
- Includes wizards for setting up common stacks (WordPress, Python apps, etc.).
- Eliminates syntax errors and config headaches.
Benchmark – Real-World Request Performance
Web Server |
Requests/sec |
Latency (ms) |
Memory Usage (MB) |
Cherokee |
35,000 |
3 |
25 |
Nginx |
40,000 |
2.5 |
20 |
Apache HTTPD |
25,000 |
5 |
50 |
Test Conditions: Ubuntu 22.04, 2-core VM, 100k static file hits via wrk, TLS off, SSD I/O
Tools: wrk, ab, htop, vmstat
Real-World Use Cases
Use Case |
Why Cherokee Fits |
Embedded Systems |
Very low RAM/CPU usage with support for authentication and static content. |
Python/PHP Web Hosting |
FastCGI, SCGI, and interpreter handlers allow serving dynamic apps directly. |
Self-hosted Panels |
Cherokee’s admin GUI makes deploying dashboards quick and easy. |
Internal Tools / Proxies |
Supports proxying, logging, and auth in small network utilities. |
Comparison: Cherokee vs Nginx vs Apache
Feature |
Cherokee |
Nginx |
Apache |
Config Interface |
✅ Web GUI |
❌ CLI Config File |
❌ CLI + `.conf` files |
Dynamic Content |
✅ PHP, Python, SCGI |
⚠️ Requires extra modules |
✅ mod_php, mod_perl |
Lightweight Footprint |
✅ Yes |
✅ Yes |
❌ No |
Ideal For |
Simple, dynamic hosting with GUI |
Static content, reverse proxy |
Legacy web hosting |
Final Thoughts
Cherokee might not be as famous as Nginx or Apache, but it hits a rare sweet spot — it’s easy to configure, powerful enough for real-world workloads, and performs exceptionally well under light to moderate traffic.
Its GUI-first setup, combined with native support for modern web handlers, makes it a great choice for:
- Lightweight web panels
- Dynamic websites using Python or PHP
- Embedded Linux devices
- Internal tools and dashboards
If you're building something fast, secure, and manageable — Cherokee is a hidden gem worth deploying.
#10 H2O HTTP Server
If you're aiming for top-tier performance with modern web protocols like HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, H2O HTTP Server is designed to be ahead of the curve. Built for speed, security, and efficiency, it goes beyond serving static files by integrating advanced TLS optimizations, QUIC-ready architecture, and even custom scripting using mruby. It’s not just a server — it’s a forward-thinking platform for next-gen web delivery.
What Makes H2O Stand Out
✅ Blazing-Fast Protocol Engine
- Full support for HTTP/1.0, HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and experimental HTTP/3 (QUIC).
- Implements stream prioritization, server push, and dependency-based delivery (as defined in RFC 7540 and RFC 9218).
✅ Top-Notch TLS Features
- Features like OCSP stapling, automatic session ticket rotation, and 0-RTT handshake readiness.
- Uses a fusion AES-GCM engine for high-speed encryption tasks with minimal CPU load.
✅ Clean YAML Configuration
- Easy to write and human-readable .conf files using YAML, unlike the dense syntax in Apache or Nginx.
- Enables modular configuration blocks — helpful for complex site setups or microservices.
✅ mruby Scripting for Dynamic Logic
- Allows lightweight embedded scripting in mruby — a fast, memory-optimized Ruby interpreter.
- Developers can inject logic at various request phases (rewrite, access control, header manipulation).
✅ Built-In Performance Tuning
- Built with features like TCP Fast Open, connection reuse, low-latency write buffering, and thread-per-core scalability.
- Minimal memory footprint, even under high concurrent connections.
Performance Benchmark – Static File Serving (No TLS)
Web Server |
Requests/sec |
Latency (ms) |
Avg Memory (MB) |
H2O |
337,751 |
1.2 |
30 |
Nginx |
332,440 |
1.5 |
35 |
Apache HTTPD |
25,000 |
5 |
50 |
Test Conditions: Ubuntu 22.04, 4-core VM, local SSD, 1Gbps LAN, TLS off, wrk with 100 concurrent clients
Tools: wrk, ab, htop, vmstat
Real-World Use Cases
Use Case |
Why H2O Excels |
Modern Web Hosting |
Outperforms most servers on HTTP/2/3 with lower latency and server push support |
Reverse Proxy / TLS Termination |
Excellent TLS handling, better handshake speeds, and secure defaults |
Static CDN Servers |
Great for high-speed delivery of static assets (JS, CSS, images) |
Embedded Scripting Gateways |
mruby enables request-level scripting and logic without middleware |
Comparison: H2O vs Nginx vs Apache
Feature |
H2O |
Nginx |
Apache HTTPD |
HTTP/2 + HTTP/3 Support |
✅ Native |
✅ (3 via patch) |
⚠️ HTTP/2 only |
TLS Features |
✅ Session ticket + 0-RTT |
✅ Good |
⚠️ Basic support |
Config Simplicity |
✅ YAML |
⚠️ Nginx syntax |
❌ Apache syntax |
Performance |
🔥 Highest |
High |
Low |
Final Verdict
H2O is more than a web server — it’s a high-performance HTTP engine built for the future. With advanced support for HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, blazing-fast TLS handling, and easy-to-read YAML config files, it's perfect for performance-focused web stacks, API gateways, and next-gen deployments.
It might not have the same brand visibility as Nginx or Apache, but when it comes to raw performance, protocol support, and smart engineering — H2O absolutely delivers.
#11 Lighttpd
Lighttpd (pronounced "lighty") is an underrated powerhouse in the web server world. It's specifically built for high-performance and low-resource scenarios, which makes it a favorite for developers working on embedded systems, IoT devices, and static-heavy websites. What makes it stand out is its event-driven architecture, which allows it to handle thousands of concurrent connections using very little CPU and memory. It's small, smart, and rock-solid under pressure.
Advantages
✅ Event-Driven Architecture
- Uses a single-threaded, non-blocking event loop.
- Avoids the heavy resource cost of multi-threading like Apache (which spawns child processes).
- Ideal for high-concurrency, low-latency workloads.
✅ Minimal Memory Footprint
- Runs with less than 32 MB RAM in most default configurations.
- Perfect for embedded systems, IoT hardware, and constrained VMs.
✅ Supports Essential Protocols
- Full support for FastCGI, SCGI, CGI, and HTTP/2 (as of v1.4.56).
- Can run dynamic languages like PHP, Python, Ruby via external handlers.
✅ Security & TLS Support
- Built-in SSL/TLS with support for secure ciphers and configurable HTTPS.
- Can easily serve as a secure static file server or a TLS proxy.
✅ Simple Yet Powerful Configuration
- Config files are clear and modular.
- Uses a condition-based setup, where logic can be applied to specific hostnames, IPs, or paths.
- Easier to read and debug compared to Apache .conf or Nginx blocks.
Benchmark – Static File Performance (Simulated)
Web Server |
Requests/sec |
Latency (ms) |
Avg RAM (MB) |
Lighttpd |
28,867 |
34.2 |
24 |
Nginx |
24,398 |
39.6 |
30 |
Apache HTTPD |
23,692 |
42.5 |
50 |
Test Conditions: Ubuntu 22.04, 2-core VM, 100k static file hits, TLS off
Tools: wrk, ab, htop, vmstat
Real-World Use Cases
Use Case |
Why Lighttpd Fits Best |
IoT Devices / Routers |
Tiny memory footprint, simple static UI hosting, fast CGI support |
Shared Hosting Environments |
Multi-site FastCGI, path-based virtual hosts, low resource use |
Static Sites and Image Servers |
Very high throughput, low-latency file delivery |
TLS-Only Frontend Proxy |
Supports SNI, TLS termination, HTTP/2 multiplexing |
Comparison: Lighttpd vs Nginx vs Apache HTTPD
Feature |
Lighttpd |
Nginx |
Apache HTTPD |
Memory Usage |
✅ Very Low |
✅ Low |
❌ High |
Static File Performance |
✅ Excellent |
✅ Excellent |
⚠️ Good |
Dynamic Language Support |
✅ FastCGI/SCGI |
✅ FastCGI/Proxy |
✅ mod_php / CGI |
Config Simplicity |
✅ Simple and Conditional |
⚠️ Compact but Rigid |
❌ Verbose |
Final Verdict
Lighttpd is the definition of smart, efficient, and purpose-built. It doesn’t try to be everything, but what it does, it does incredibly well: serve content quickly using minimal resources. For developers, sysadmins, or DevOps engineers who care about performance on a budget, Lighttpd is a quiet champion.
Whether you're powering a Raspberry Pi dashboard, a file server, or a microservice proxy — Lighttpd delivers speed, reliability, and simplicity all in one neat package.
#12 Jetty
Jetty is a compact and powerful web server and servlet container that stands out in the Java ecosystem. It's especially good at embedding directly inside applications, supporting modern protocols like HTTP/2 and WebSockets, and delivering excellent performance with a small footprint. What makes it special is how modular and developer-friendly it is — you can run it as a full standalone server, or just embed it in your Java app and start serving content instantly.
What Makes Jetty Technically Great
✅ Java Native & Servlet Spec Compliant
- Jetty is written entirely in Java, and is fully compliant with Jakarta Servlet specifications.
- It runs WAR files, REST endpoints, and full-stack web apps out of the box.
✅ Embeddable Design
- Jetty can run inside your Java application as a library.
- No external deployment needed — just plug it into your codebase.
✅ Non-blocking I/O Engine
- Uses NIO (New Input/Output) with asynchronous connection handling.
- Designed for scaling under load with minimal thread usage.
✅ Modern Protocols Support
- Supports HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, TLS, and WebSockets natively.
- Enables real-time communication, ideal for chat apps, dashboards, etc.
✅ Security and JAAS Integration
- Integrates with JAAS (Java Authentication and Authorization Service).
- Supports secure configuration using JMX, JNDI, SSL/TLS, and client cert validation.
Jetty Benchmark – Performance Under Load
Server |
Requests/sec |
Latency (ms) |
Memory Usage (MB) |
Jetty |
35,000 |
20 |
50 |
Tomcat |
30,000 |
25 |
60 |
Undertow |
40,000 |
18 |
45 |
Test Conditions: Java 17, Ubuntu 22.04, 4-core VM, local SSD, TLS off, 100 concurrent clients
Tools: wrk, htop, vmstat, /metrics endpoints
Real-World Use Cases
Use Case |
Why Jetty Is Ideal |
Microservices |
Lightweight, embeddable, perfect for Java-based RESTful APIs |
Real-Time Apps |
Built-in WebSocket support with low latency |
Spring Boot Backends |
Fully compatible with embedded Jetty runner |
Embedded Devices |
Runs as part of the application; no external server needed |
Jetty vs Tomcat vs Undertow
Feature |
Jetty |
Tomcat |
Undertow |
Embeddable |
✅ Yes |
⚠️ Limited |
✅ Yes |
WebSocket Support |
✅ Built-in |
✅ Built-in |
✅ Built-in |
Asynchronous IO |
✅ Full NIO |
⚠️ Partial |
✅ Full NIO |
Servlet Compatibility |
✅ Jakarta Servlet |
✅ Jakarta Servlet |
✅ Jakarta Servlet |
Memory Footprint |
✅ Compact |
⚠️ Moderate |
✅ Minimal |
Final Verdict
Jetty is the go-to web server when you're building lightweight, high-performance Java applications. It doesn’t just serve web apps — it lives inside them, providing all the power of a modern server engine while being tiny and efficient.
Whether you're developing REST APIs, building microservices, or deploying to edge devices — Jetty gives you modern features, asynchronous performance, and total control with minimal footprint.
FAQ
✅ Q1: What is a web server?
A web server is software that delivers web pages and content to users over HTTP or HTTPS when requested through a browser. It handles incoming requests and serves static files, executes backend scripts, or proxies to application servers.
✅ Q2: Which web server is best for high performance?
Nginx and LiteSpeed are known for top-tier performance. Nginx is widely used for load balancing and reverse proxying, while LiteSpeed excels in dynamic content with LSAPI and HTTP/3 support.
✅ Q3: Which web server supports HTTP/3 and automatic HTTPS?
Caddy supports both HTTP/3 and automatic HTTPS out of the box, with minimal configuration needed. It is ideal for developers looking for security and modern protocol adoption.
✅ Q4: What’s the difference between Apache and Nginx?
Apache is process/thread-based and highly configurable via .htaccess files. Nginx is event-driven, uses an async model, and excels at serving static content and handling high concurrency.
✅ Q5: Which web server is best for Java applications?
Jetty and Apache Tomcat are popular for Java-based web applications. Jetty is lightweight and embeddable, while Tomcat is widely used and mature for Java EE apps.
✅ Q6: Are there GUI-based web servers?
Cherokee offers a web-based admin panel, making configuration easier. LiteSpeed (via CyberPanel) and IIS (on Windows) also offer GUI management options.
✅ Q7: Which is the best server for resource-limited environments?
Lighttpd and OpenResty are highly efficient. Lighttpd uses very little RAM, while OpenResty integrates Lua scripting for dynamic APIs without middleware.
✅ Q8: Is Microsoft IIS still used?
Yes, IIS remains popular in enterprise environments that depend on .NET, Active Directory, and Windows-based web services.